SHRI DIGAMBAR JAIN KHANDELWAL PANCHAYAT,NAGPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(E) and remanded the case for fresh adjudication. The assessee was directed to provide all necessary documents, and the CIT(E) was directed to provide an opportunity of hearing.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Shri Digambar Jain Khandelwal Panchayat, appealed against the denial of registration by the CIT(E). The CIT(E) denied registration solely on the ground that the assessee failed to submit details of its activities.
What were the issues?
Whether the denial of registration by the CIT(E) was justified without providing a proper opportunity to the assessee to submit its details.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH : : NAGPUR
Before: SHRI S.S.GODARA & DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE
ORDER
PER DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM:
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of ld.CIT(E), Pune under section 12AA(1)(b)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 30.12.2019. Findings & Analysis : 2. We have heard both the parties and perused records. On perusal of the ld.CIT(E)’s order, it is observed that ld.CIT(E) has denied the registration only on one ground i.e. assessee failed to Shri Digambar Jain Khandelwal Panchayat [A] submit the details of the activities carried out in spite of giving opportunity. The ld.Authorised Representative for the assessee submitted that all the necessary details were filed and it is a very Old Trust.
On the other hand, the ld.Departmental Representative of the Revenue relied on the orders of the Lower Authorities.
In these facts and circumstances of the case, the order of the ld.CIT(E) is set-aside to ld.CIT(E) for denovo adjudication after giving opportunity. The assessee shall provide all the necessary document required by the ld.CIT(E). Ld.CIT(E) shall provide opportunity of hearing. Accordingly, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026