DYNAMIX INDIA DRILL CON CO.,NEW DELHI vs. THE ASSESSING OFFICER CIRCLE 62(1) INCOME TAX CIVIC CENTER MINTO ROAD, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the delay should have been condoned and the appeal decided on merits. The Tribunal restored the appeal to the CIT(A) with a direction to condone the delay and decide the case on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed due to delay in filing. The assessee claimed the delay was due to the genuine medical grounds of their Authorized Representative, who suffered from renal failure.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in not condoning the delay in filing the appeal on genuine medical grounds and in not deciding the appeal on merits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘B’, NEW DELHI
Before: SH. N. K. BILLAIYA & MS. ASTHA CHANDRA
BEFORE SH. N. K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS. ASTHA CHANDRA, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2018-19 Dynamix India Drill Con. Co. Assessing Officer G-4, 208/209, Sector- 16, Circle – 62 (1) Rohini, New Delhi Vs. Income Tax Civic Centre, PAN No.AADF05426B Minto Road, Delhi (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Appellant by None Respondent by Sh. Sh. Vivek Upadhyay, Sr. DR Date of hearing: 02/11/2023 Date of Pronouncement: 02/11/2023 ORDER
PER N. K. BILLAIYA, AM:
This appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order dated 26.07.2022 by NFAC, Delhi pertaining to A.Y. 2018-19.
The grievance of the assessee read as under :- 1. On the facts & in the circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred in not condoning the delay in filing of appeal disregarding the extension order granted by the Hon'ble Courts for extension of the time limit as well as inhumanly turning a blind eye towards the genuine medical grounds of the CA/AR of the appellant.
2. On the facts & in the circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred in not disposing off the appeal on merits, when all details necessary for the said purpose on record.
On the facts & in the circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred in not adjudicating and by implication, not directing deletion of disallowance as made by the learned Assessing Officer in respect of employees' contribution to PF / ESI, invoking provisions of section 36(1)(va) of the Act. 3. A perusal of the order of the NFAC show that the appeal of the assessee was filed beyond the limitation period before the CIT(A) and the delay was not condoned. We find from the form No.35 the assessee has specifically mentioned that both the kidneys of the authorized representative stopped functioning and because of the renal failure the appeal could not be filed on time yet the NFAC did not accept this as a reasonable and sufficient cause and dismissed the appeal. 4. We are of the considered view that the delay should have been condoned and the appeal should been decided on merits of the case, therefore, in the interest of justice and fair play we restore the appeal to the files of the CIT(A)/NFAC. The CIT(A) is directed to condone the delay and decide the appeal on merits of the case after affording a reasonable and sufficient opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
Order pronounced in the open court in the presence of both the parties on 02.11.2023.
More judgments on Section 36(1)(va)
- Vco Consulatatns and Sevices Private… vs ITO, Corporate Ward 3(3), ChennaiITA 2145/CHNY/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- R K Swamy Limited, Chennai vs DCIT Non Corporate Circle 10(1), ChennaiITA 504/CHNY/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- M/S. R.K. Swamy Ltd., Chennai vs DCIT, Ncc-10(1), ChennaiITA 2822/CHNY/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 839/IND/2025[2023-2024]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2023-2024
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 838/IND/2025[2022-2023]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2022-2023
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026