SANTOSH CHETAL,HARYANA vs. ITO WARD-4, HATYANA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw their appeal. The assessee stated they would pursue other legal remedies for claiming the refund.
What were the facts?
The assessee initially offered interest on additional compensation to tax. Later, upon receiving a notice under Section 148, the assessee filed a revised return claiming exemption under Section 10(37) and seeking a refund. The Assessing Officer dropped proceedings under Section 147 and issued a NIL demand notice.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in not granting the refund claimed by the assessee in the return filed in response to a Section 148 notice. The primary issue became the assessee's decision to withdraw the appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, [ DELHI BENCH “G” : DELHI ]
Before: SHRI G. S. PANNU, HON’BLE VICE-SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD
आदेश / O R D E R PER C. N. PRASAD, J. M. :
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [hereinafter referred to 1 CIT (Appeals)] Hisar, dated 30.11.2018 for assessment year 2008-09 in dismissing the appeal of the assessee and not granting refund claimed by the assessee.
In the course of hearing we observe that the assessee filed return originally offering interest on additional compensation received by the assessee on acquisition of lands to tax. Upon issue of notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) and in response to the said notice a return was filed claiming exemption under section 10(37)in respect of interest on additional compensation received along with refund of taxes paid. 3. The Assessing Officer passed assessment under section 143(3) dropping proceedings under section 147 of the Act initiated through notice dated 30.03.2015 for the assessment year under consideration. The Assessing Officer also issued NIL demand notice to the assessee. Assessee filed appeal before the ld. CIT (Appeals) contending that the Assessing Officer is not justified in not considering the return filed in response to notice issued under section 148 of the Act and passing a speaking order on the claim made for exemption under section 10(37) of the Act on the interest on compensation and for not issuing refund as claimed in the return filed in response to section 148 of the Act. 4. On a query from the bench as to how an appeal can lie against the order passed by the Assessing Officer in accepting the income returned by the assessee and dropping the proceedings initiated under section 147 of the Act and not granting refund as claimed in the return the ld. Counsel for the assessee submits that the assessee may be permitted to withdraw the appeal. The ld. Counsel filed letter dated 2.11.2023 to that effect withdrawing the appeal stating that he will pursue other legal remedies for claiming refund of taxes claimed in the return filed in response to section 148 of the Act. In view of the submissions of the ld. Counsel and the written request for withdrawal of appeal, we permit the assessee to withdraw the appeal and to pursue alternate remedy available under law for claiming refund. 5. In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on : 09/11/2023.
Sd/- Sd/- ( G. S. PANNU ) ( C. N. PRASAD ) VICE-PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated : 09/11/2023. *MEHTA*
आदेश की �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. आवेदक / Assessee 2. राज� / Revenue 3. संबंिधत आयकर आयु� / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु�- अपील / CIT (A) 5. िवभागीय �ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, DELHI / DR, ITAT, DELHI
More judgments on Section 10(37)
- Rameshbhai Gordhanbhai Dudhagara, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 738/RJT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Rameshbhai Gordhanbhai Dudhagara, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 738/RJT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Naresh Kumar, Gurgaon, Haryana vs PCIT, JaipurITA 209/JPR/2024[2019-20]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Sudhakar Purushottam Bhalerao, Osmanabad vs ITO Ward 1, LaturITA 2882/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Kumar Satish, Gurugram vs ITO Ward 2(2), GurugramITA 6552/DEL/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Shadab Malik vs. State Of U.P. And 2 OthersAllahabad · 26 Oct 2026