DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 2, NEW DELHI vs. INTERNATIONAL RECREATION AND AMUSEMENT LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that in the assessee's own cases for other assessment years, the Revenue's appeals were dismissed for statistical purposes due to insolvency proceedings and an approved resolution plan. Therefore, the current appeals were also dismissed for statistical purposes.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed appeals against the orders of the CIT(A) concerning assessment years 2011-12 and 2015-16. The assessee did not appear for the hearing.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the Revenue's appeals retained any substance given the insolvency proceedings and approved resolution plan of the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES : A : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI M. BALAGANESH & SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA
ORDER
PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM:
The appeals are preferred by the Revenue against the order dated 15.02.2018 of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-28, New Delhi (hereinafter referred as Ld. First Appellate Authority or in short Ld. ‘FAA’) in appeal No.354 & 355/17-18 arising out of an appeal before it against the orders dated 30.12.2016 passed u/s 153A r.w.s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
International Recreation and Amusement Ltd. vs. DCIT ITAs No.2792 & 2793/Del/2018 (hereinafter referred as ‘the Act’) by the ITO, Central Circle-2, New Delhi, (hereinafter referred as the Ld. AO).
Heard and perused the record. None appeared for the assessee and the record shows that notices have been repeatedly issued. Accordingly, no more opportunity is justifiable. The ld. DR pointed out that in assessee’s own case for AYs 2012-13, 2013-14 and 2014-15, vide 993 & 994/Del/2018, order dated 12th January, 2023, the Revenue’s appeals have been dismissed for statistical purposes on the basis of the fact that insolvency proceedings have been initiated against the Respondent assessee under the relevant provisions of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and the resolution plan stands approved.
In the light of the aforesaid admitted facts, no substance is left in the Revenue’s claim as the same becomes part of the resolution plan. Accordingly, the appeals of the Revenue is dismissed for statistical purposes, however, with a liberty for restoration of the appeals in case there is any order under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 in favour of the Revenue. Order pronounced in the open court on 16.11.2023. Sd/- Sd/- (M. BALAGANESH) (ANUBHAV SHARMA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 16th November, 2023. dk
International Recreation and Amusement Ltd. vs. DCIT ITAs No.2792 & 2793/Del/2018
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026