DEN FK CABLE TV NETWORK PRIVATE LIMITED,DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-7(1), DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the assessee had already suo motu disallowed the amount and disclosed it, the disallowance by the Assessing Officer was redundant. Therefore, the appeal of the assessee was allowed.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer disallowed an amount of Rs. 260,000 under Section 37(1) based on the Tax Audit Report. However, the assessee had already suo motu disallowed this amount under Section 40(a) and disclosed it in their return of income.
What were the issues?
Whether the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer was justified when the assessee had already suo motu made the same disallowance.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘B’, NEW DELHI
Before: Dr. B. R. R. KumarMs. Astha Chandra
ORDER Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar:- The present appeal has been filed by assessee against the order of Ld. NFAC/CIT(A), Delhi dated 03.02.2023.
It was submitted before us that an amount of Rs. 260,000/- was disallowed by the Assessing Officer u/s. 37(1) of the Act on the basis of disclosure in the Tax Audit Report even though the same was suo moto disallowed by the appellant u/s. 40(a) of the Act and specifically disclosed the return of income and computation of income. The facts are not in dispute and hence, the appeal of the assessee is hereby allowed.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 17/11/2023.
More judgments on Section 37(1)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Smit Navnitlal Soni, Ahmedabad, Gujarat vs ITO Ward-5(3)(1), Ahmedabad, GujaratITA 1434/AHD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shobha Sudamrao Tagad, Ahmednagar vs ITO WD-1, AhmednagarITA 311/PUN/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Digjam Limited, Jamnagar vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 349/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 839/IND/2025[2023-2024]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2023-2024
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026