ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-13, NEW DELHI vs. DOUBLE PLUS SOFTWARE P.LTD, NEDW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the addition of Rs. 190 crores on the ground of double taxation was not justified as the appellate proceedings for the other companies were not final. The matter was remanded for fresh hearing on merits regarding the addition under Section 68.
What were the facts?
The assessee company received Rs. 190 crores as share capital and premium. This amount was invested in three other companies, which in turn returned the funds through a series of inter-company endorsements of cheques. The Assessing Officer treated this as unexplained cash credit.
What were the issues?
Whether the introduction of share capital through a circular transaction of cheque endorsements constitutes an unexplained cash credit under Section 68, and if taxing the same income in multiple companies amounts to double taxation.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- ITO v. Bachu Lal Kapoor60 citing60 ITR 74 · 1966 · SC
- 182-193 Dharmvir Merchandise (P.) Ltd. v. ITO4 citing149 Taxmann.com 221 · 2023 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: B NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, HONBLE(AS
PER MS. MADHUMITA ROY: JUDICIAL MEMBER: The instant appeal filed by the Department is directed against the order dated 29.03.2018 passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-3, Delhi arising out of the assessment order dated 25.03.2013 issued by the ITO, Ward-10(4), New Delhi under Section 143(3) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”)
Page 2 Double Plus Software Pvt. Ltd. whereby and whereunder the addition to the tune of Rs.190,00,000 under Section 68 of the Act has been de
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026