OXYGEN BUSINESS PARK PRIVATE LIMITED,NOIDA vs. ITO,WARD INT. TAXATION 2(2)(2), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1241/DEL/2023Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 December 2023AY 2014-15Bench: SHRI G. S. PANNU, HON’BLE VICE-PRESIDENT A N D SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD (Judicial Member)4 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Assessing Officer, after verification, accepted the assessee's claim that no interest was liable to be charged under section 201(1A) as the amount was NIL. The Tribunal found no grievance in the appeal.

What were the facts?

The assessee appealed against an order related to interest under section 201(1A) for delayed TDS deposit. The CIT(Appeals) directed the Assessing Officer to verify the assessee's claim of having already paid the interest.

What were the issues?

Whether interest under section 201(1A) is leviable when the assessee claims to have paid it and the AO verifies this claim.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 201(1),Section 201(1A),Section 250

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, [ DELHI BENCH “D” : DELHI ]

Before: SHRI G. S. PANNU, HON’BLE VICE-SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Rotti
For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar
Hearing: 08/12/2023

आदेश / O R D E R PER C. N. PRASAD, J. M. :

1.

This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-24 [hereinafter referred 1 to CIT (Appeals)] New Delhi, dated 28.02.2023 for the assessment year 2014-15 arising out of the order passed by the Assessing Officer under section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) in directing the Assessing Officer to verify the correctness of the claim of the assessee that it had paid interest under section 201(1A) of the Act even before ther order under section 201(1A) was passed.

2.

In the course of hearing the ld. Counsel for the assessee submits that on the directions of the ld. CIT (Appeals) the Assessing Officer passed a consequential order dated 30.08.2023 under section 250 of the Act wherein the Assessing Officer has accepted the claim of the assessee that no interest under section 201(1A) of the Act is liable to be charged after verifying the documentary evidence furnished and finally arriving at interest paid under section 201(1A) of the Act at NIL. 3. The ld. DR fairly submits that in the consequential order the assessee has got relief from the Assessing Officer. 4. On hearing both the parties and perusing the consequential order we find that the contentions of the assessee before the ld. CIT (Appeals) that it is not liable to pay interest for delay in depositing TDS was accepted on verification of the documentary evidences and ultimately the Assessing Officer concluded that no interest is liable to be charged under section 201(1A) of the Act in the order passed giving effect to the order of the ld. CIT (Appeals). In the circumstances we see no grievance in the appeal of the assessee and the same is dismissed accordingly.

5.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on : 08/12/2023.

More judgments on Section 201(1)

All 3,835 judgments and leading authorities on Section 201(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →