CAMERON(SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.,TAMILNADU vs. ACIT, CIRCLE INT. TAX-1(2)(1), DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the management support services provided by the assessee did not fall under the definition of FTS as they did not make available technical knowledge or skill to the recipient, following its own previous decisions on identical facts. The Tribunal also directed the AO to consider the plea for granting TDS credit.
What were the facts?
The assessee received fees for management support services, which the Assessing Officer (AO) treated as Fees for Technical Services (FTS) under the Income Tax Act and the India-Singapore DTAA. The assessee contended that these services did not make available technical knowledge or skill as required by the treaty.
What were the issues?
Whether management support services constitute Fees for Technical Services (FTS) under the Act and DTAA, and whether TDS credit was wrongly denied.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Para 21, 22, 24, 25, 26 10. Magotteaux International SA v. DCIT13 citing141 Taxmann.com 8 · 2022
- 1. Inter Continental Hotels Group (Asia Pacific) (Pte.) Ltd. v. ACIT3 citing133 Taxmann.com 99 · 2021
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, [ DELHI BENCH “D” : DELHI ]
Before: SHRI G. S. PANNU, HON’BLE VICE-SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD
PER C. N. PRASAD, J. M. :
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the final assessment order of the Assessing Officer dated 29.09.2019 passed 1 under section 143(3) read with section 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) pursuant to the directions of the DRP dated 26.08.2019 passed under section 144C(5) of the Act for the assessment year 2016-17. 2. The asse
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 9(1)(vii)
- Mitsubishi Electric Europe B.V., Netherlands vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, New…ITA 1948/DEL/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Sabre Marketing Nederland, Bv., Netherlands vs ACIT, Circle-3(1)(2), Int. Tax., New DelhiITA 1697/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Sabre Marketing Nederland, Bv., Netherlands vs ACIT, Circle-3(1)(2), Int. Tax., New DelhiITA 1696/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Eurofins Peenya Resources Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1116/BANG/2023[2016-17]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 8… vs Aquapharm Chemicals Pvt. Ltd., PuneITA 2150/PUN/2024[2016-17]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026