PURUSHOTTAM DAS AGRAWAL,VARANASI vs. PCIT, VARANASI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw its appeal. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT against a revisionary order passed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax. During the hearing, the assessee's counsel stated that the assessee wished to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessee's appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn, as requested by the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CIRCUIT BENCH, VARANASI
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO & SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR
ORDER
PER RAMIT KOCHAR, Accountant Member This appeal filed by assessee in ITA.No.19/VNS/ 2020 for assessment year 2015-16 has arisen from the revisionaryorder passed by ld. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Varanasi u/s 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, vide revisionary order dated 29.11.2019 (DIN ITBA/REV/ S/91/2019-20/1021339558(1) )
2 ITA.No.19/VNS/2020 ShriPurushottam Das Agrawal, Varanasi. Assessment year 2015-16 2. When this appeal came-up for hearing before the Division Bench, the Learned Counsels for the assessee namely ShriSubhash Chand &ShriAshutoshBhardwaj, Advocates stated before the Bench that the assessee wants to withdraw its appeal. The assessee has also filed duly signed letter dated 04.07.2022, wherein the assessee has prayed that he may be allowed to withdraw his appeal filed with tribunal, in for ay: 2015-16.
The Learned Sr. D.R. has no objection if the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
After hearing both the sides and considering the material on record, we allow the assessee to withdraw his appeal. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee in ITA no. 19/VNS/2020 for ay: 2015-16 ,is dismissed as withdrawn. We order accordingly.
In the result, appeal filed by assessee in ITA no. 19/VNS/2020 for ay: 2015-16 is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in open Court on the conclusion of the hearing i.e., on 04.07.2022 at Varanasi, U.P., in the presence of both the parties.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sri Alok Kumar Singh vs. The State Of Assam And 3 OrsGauhati · 5 Nov 2026
- Sri Mintu Das vs. The Union Of INDIA And 3 OrsGauhati · 5 Nov 2026
- Alhanney Guest House vs. The State Of Assam And 3 OrsGauhati · 5 Nov 2026
- Abdul Majid vs. The Union Of INDIA And 3 OrsGauhati · 5 Nov 2026
- Dipankar Borgohain vs. The Union Of INDIA And 7 OrsGauhati · 5 Nov 2026