SHRI JAYESHBHAI G. BALAR,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-8(2), SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal followed its earlier decision in the co-owner's case, where relief was granted to the extent of 50% of the deemed sale consideration. Therefore, the assessee was granted similar partial relief.
What were the facts?
The assessee sold a piece of land along with co-owners. The Assessing Officer invoked Section 50C and made an addition to the Short Term Capital Gains based on the valuation of the Assistant Valuation Officer. The assessee's case was similar to that of a co-owner whose appeal was decided by the Tribunal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the correctness of the valuation of the land for the purpose of determining capital gains under Section 50C. The Tribunal had to decide whether to confirm the AO's addition or grant relief based on comparable rates and other factors.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Assessee by Shri Rasesh Shah, CA Revenue by Ms. Anupama Singla,Sr-DR Date of hearing 09.03.2022 Date of pronouncement 09.03.2022 Order under section 254(1) of Income Tax Act PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by assessee is directed against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals)-3 Surat [for short to as ‘CIT(A)’] dated 03.02.2015 for assessment year (AY) 2007-08, which in turn arise out of assessment order passed by Assessing Officer under section 143(3) r.w.s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) vide order dated 29.01.2013. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:- “(1)The ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in law and on facts in confirming the addition made by the ld. A.O u/s 50C of the Act to the tune of Rs.23,57,381/-. (2)The Appellant prays for granting such other relief as maybe deemed just and proper by your Honours considering the factual and legal aspects of the case of the appellant.”
(A.Y. 07-08) Sh.Jayeshbhai G Balar 2. At the outset of hearing, Ld. Authorized Representative (AR) for the assessee submits that the grounds of appeal raised by assessee is covered by the decision of Tribunal in assessee’s co-owner’s case in the case of Shri Vinubhai V Navadia vs. DCIT, Central Circle-1,Suratin for AY 2007-08 dated 26.04.2017, copy of which is placed on record. The Ld. AR of the assessee submits that during the assessment, the Assessing Officer made addition of Short Term Capital Gains (STCG for short) by invoking of provision of section 50C of the Act. The assessee sold a piece of land alongwith his co-owner, namely, Vinubhai V Navadia and Shri Mavjibhai P. Kakadia. All there were having equal share i.e. 1/3 each. In one of the co-owner’s case, the report of Assistant valuation officer of Income tax Department was filed. The Assistant valuation officer valued the one-third share of property at Rs.34,90,000/-. On the basis of such valuation, the Assessing Officer made addition of STCG in case of Vinubhai V Navadia. In case of Vinubhai V Navadia, the Tribunal granted relief to the extent @ 50% of deemed sale consideration and allow partial relief. The case of assessee is exactly same, therefore the order of Tribunal in co-owner’s case of assessee may be followed.
3. On the other hand, Ld. Senior Departmental Representative (Sr.DR) for the Revenue supported the order of Ld. CIT(A).
More judgments on Section 50C
- M N S Barium Salts, Kadapa vs ITO, Ward-1, KadapaITA 2412/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sawalchand Chunilal Bafna HUF, Mumbai vs Income Tax Officer-16(1)(1), MumbaiITA 7492/MUM/2025[2011-12]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2011-12
- Jagdishbhai Vasharambhai Italiya, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-3(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 150/AHD/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Rohini Ramhari Bhadale, Pune vs Assessing Officer Ward 2(2) Pune, PuneITA 2767/PUN/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Sweta Somani, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 44(2), KolkataITA 1656/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026