INCOME TAX OFFICER- 3(2), KANPUR vs. SHRI MAYUR GUPTA, KANPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme order had been passed for full and final settlement of tax arrears. Consequently, the appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed appeals against orders of the CIT(A) for AY 2014-15 and 2015-16. The assessee opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, leading to a full and final settlement of tax arrears.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals filed by the Revenue should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and settlement of tax arrears.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH ‘A’, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA & SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA
O R D E R PER BENCH: These appeals are preferred by the Revenue against separate orders dated 27.11.2018 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Kanpur for Assessment Years 2014-15 & 2015-16.
At the outset, it was noticed that the I.T.O.(T&J) on behalf of the Revenue has submitted an application dated 13.02.2024, received by the Registry of this Office on 23.02.2024, vide which it has been stated that Income Tax Department has passed Order in Form No.5 on 15.11.2021 for Assessment Years 2014-15 & 2015-16 under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The Revenue has filed the copies of Form No.5, i.e., the order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Kanpur for full and final settlement of tax arrears under section 5(2) read with section 6 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
I.T.A. No.187 & 188/Lkw/2020 2
It was contended on behalf of the Revenue that since the assessee has opted for Vivad Se Viswas Scheme and tax payable by the assessee has been deposited and order for final settlement of tax arrears has been passed by the designated authority, therefore, the appeals filed by the Revenue may be dismissed as withdrawn.
The assessee has also filed an application dated 20.01.2024 enclosing therewith the copies of Form No.5, i.e., the order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Kanpur for full and final settlement of tax arrears under section 5(2) read with section 6 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 and stated that the appeals filed by the Department are liable to be withdrawn. 5. Accordingly, since the order has been passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Kanpur for full and final settlement of tax arrears under section 5(2) read with section 6 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, for A.Y. 2014-15, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed. 6. In the final result, both the appeals of the Revenue stand dismissed.
(Order pronounced in the open court on 19/03/2024)
More judgments on Section 5(2)
- Dy. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Jaipur vs Kavita Khanwani, BeawarITA 867/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- ACIT Circle-3(1)(1), International… vs Toyota Tsusho Corporation, GurgaonITA 1908/DEL/2020[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Gurgaon vs DCIT Circle-3(1)(1) International Taxation…ITA 1514/DEL/2020[2016-17]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Gurgaon vs DCIT Circle 3(1)(1) International Taxation…ITA 1513/DEL/2020[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- DCIT Circle-3(1)(1) International Taxation… vs Toyota Tsusho Corporation, GurgaonITA 1508/DEL/2020[2016-17]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Jsw Cement Limited,Jajpur vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sreeshobi Enterprises vs. The Appellate AuthorityMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- S.T.Promotors vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026