NARMADA SILK INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD,SURAT vs. PR. CIT-1, SURAT

PDF · subscribers
ITA 193/SRT/2020Status: DisposedITAT Surat01 June 2022AY 2015-162 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw its appeal. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee challenged an order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) under Section 263. Subsequently, the Assessing Officer passed a fresh assessment order accepting the original assessment, rendering the assessee's grievance resolved.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the validity of the PCIT's order under Section 263. However, the appeal became infructuous due to a subsequent assessment order.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 263,Section 143(3),Section 144B

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Assessee represented by Shri Bipin Jariwala, Advocate Respondent represented by Shri H.P. Meena, CIT-DR Date of hearing 01/06/2022 Date of pronouncement 01/06/2022 Order under section 254(1) of Income Tax Act PER: PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

1. 1. This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of learned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Surat (in short, the ld. PCIT) dated 24/04/2020 passed under section 263 of Income-tax Act for the Assessment year 2015-16.

2. At the outset of hearing, the ld AR of the assessee submits that in the present appeal, the assessee has challenged the validity of order passed by the ld. PCIT under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, the Act) dated 24/04/2020. The ld. AR further submits that in pursuance of order under section 263 dated 24/04/2020, the Assessing Officer passed Narmada Silk Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs PCIT assessment order under Section 143(3) r.w.s. 263/144B of the Act on 30/03/2022 and accepted the assessee’s income as per original assessment order dated 22/12/2017, therefore, the assessee left no grievance in the present appeal and the assessee prayed that he may be allowed to withdraw the present appeal.

3.

On the other hand, the ld. CIT-DR for the revenue has no objection if the assessee is allowed to withdraw its appeal.

4.

Considering the contention of the ld. AR of the assessee, we permit the assessee to withdraw its appeal, therefore, this appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

5.

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 01 June, 2022 at the time of hearing of appeal.

More judgments on Section 263

All 13,616 judgments and leading authorities on Section 263 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →