NANAVATI CARS PVT. LTD.,SURAT vs. PR. CIT-1, SURAT
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee's counsel stated that the assessee did not wish to press the appeal. The Departmental Representative did not object to this submission. Consequently, the Tribunal treated the appeal as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee preferred an appeal before the ITAT challenging an order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The assessment year in question was 2015-16.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee wished to withdraw its appeal before the Tribunal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JM & DR. A. L. SAINI, AM
सुनवाईक�तार�ख/ Date of Hearing : 02/06/2022 घोषणाक�तार�ख/Date of Pronouncement : 02/06/2022 आदेश / O R D E R
PER DR. A. L. SAINI, AM:
The present appeal is preferred by the assessee challenging the impugned order dated 24.04.2020, passed by the Learned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Surat [in short “the PCIT-1”] under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as “the Act”].
Before us, the Learned Counsel, Ms Pinaz Bhagat, on behalf of the assessee submitted that assessee did not wish to press this appeal, to which, the learned Departmental Representative (in short the “the Ld. DR”) did not raise any objection. Consequently, we treat this appeal as withdrawn.
Assessment Year: 2015-16 Nanavati Cars Pvt. Ltd.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee (in AY.2015-16) is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in open court on 02/06/2022.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026