ACHANTA RAMU,SIDDHANTAM vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RAJAHMUNDRY

PDF · subscribers
ITA 336/VIZ/2019Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam28 April 2023AY 2014-15Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, HON’BLE (Judicial Member), SHRI S BALAKRISHNAN, HON’BLE (Accountant Member)3 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal observed that the assessee was not interested in pursuing the case, as neither the assessee nor their representative appeared on the designated dates despite notices. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed in-limine.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT. The appeal was initially dismissed ex-parte due to no representation. The assessee's application to recall the order was allowed, and the case was posted for hearing. However, the assessee's representative withdrew their Vakalat due to personal reasons.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal should be dismissed due to the assessee's lack of representation and apparent disinterest in pursuing the case.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM

Before: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, HON’BLE & SHRI S BALAKRISHNAN, HON’BLE

Hearing: 20.03.2023

O R D E R

Per Shri Duvvuru RL Reddy, Judicial Member :

1.

This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Pr.CIT), Rajahmundry vide F.No.15/263/Pr/CIT, RJY/2018-19 dated 31.03.2019 arising out of the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) for the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2014-15.

2.

In the instant case, coordinate bench of the Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the assessee ex-parte, vide it’s order No.I.T.A.336/Viz/2019 Achanta ERamu, West Godavari dated 23.08.2022, since there was no representation from assessee’s side. The assessee filed miscellaneous application, prayed for recalling the order and post the case for hearing by providing an opportunity of being heard to the assessee. Keeping in view, the principles of natural justice, the assessee’s case was recalled and posted for hearing on 23.01.2023. It is observed from the order sheet noting dated 23.01.2023, at the request of the Ld.AR, the case was adjourned to 23.03.2023. On 23.03.2023, the Ld.AR filed an affidavit that due to personal reasons he is withdrawing the Vakalat filed in this case. The series of events show that the assessee simply filed appeal before the Tribunal, but he is not interested in pursuing the case, as neither the assessee nor his representative was present on the designated dates, despite the notices were served on the assessee. In view of the above, we are inclined to dismiss the appeal of the assessee in-limine.

3.

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed in-limine.

Order pronounced in the open court on 28th April 2023. (एस बालाकृष्णन) (दुव्वूरु आर.एल रेड्डी) (S.BALAKRISHNAN) (DUVVURU RL REDDY) लेखा सदस्य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER न्याधयक सदस्य/JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated : 28.04.2023 L.Rama, SPS

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →