REYNOLD EVENTS & PROMOTIONS,NUVEM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 1, MARGAO

PDF · subscribers
ITA 49/PAN/2023Status: DisposedITAT Panaji19 December 2023AY 2014-15Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member), SHRI S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI (Judicial Member)3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal found that the NFAC passed a cryptic order without considering the assessee's submissions and the reconciliation statement. Therefore, the matter was remitted back to the NFAC for fresh consideration.

What were the facts?

The assessee, engaged in hiring sound and light equipment, filed a return of income. The Assessing Officer made an addition for the difference between Form 26AS and the books of account without giving a proper opportunity to explain.

What were the issues?

Whether the addition made by the Assessing Officer was justified without providing a proper opportunity to the assessee to explain the discrepancies between Form 26AS and the books of account.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI – VIRTUAL COURT

Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & SHRI S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI

For Appellant: Shri D. E. Robinson
For Respondent: Shri Sridhar Dora
Hearing: 15.12.2023Pronounced: 19.12.2023

ORDER

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →