DCIT, LUDHIANA vs. SH. TARSEM SINGLA, LUDHIANA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 459/CHANDI/2014Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh21 May 2018AY 2007-081 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal is hearing appeals against revision orders and subsequent additions made by the Assessing Officer. The specific outcome of the Tribunal's decision on these additions and revisions is not detailed in the provided text.

What were the facts?

The appeals involve assessees who were parties to a land sale transaction. The Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) passed revision orders under Section 263, and the CIT (Appeals) upheld additions made by the Assessing Officer during assessment proceedings under Section 143(3) read with Section 153A.

What were the issues?

The core issues revolve around the validity of the CIT's revisionary powers under Section 263 and the subsequent additions made by the AO in the assessment proceedings initiated due to a search.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 263,Section 153A,Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:

These appeals have been preferred by the different assessees

who were parties to the same transaction of sale of land. ITA No.

366/Chd/2012 and 263/Chd/2012 are appeals preferred by the

assessee Shri Amarjeet Dhall, purchaser and Shri Tarsem Singla,

Seller respectively challenging the revision order of the

Commissioner of Income Tax (herein referred to ‘ CIT’) passed u/s

263 of Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act') whereas ITA

Nos.148/chd/2014 &369/Chd/2014 have been preferred by the above

said assessees respectively agitating the action of CIT (Appeals) in

upholding the additions made by the Assessing officer in the

assessment proceedings carried out u/s 143(3) read with section 153A

of the Act in compliance of the directions issued by the CIT in his

order passed u/s 263 of the Act. The revenue has come in appeal

More judgments on Section 263

All 13,616 judgments and leading authorities on Section 263 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →