BROOKEFIELD INFRA PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED ( FORMERLY KNOWN AS YESOSRI CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED),VIJAYAWADA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(3), VIJAYAWADA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal in-limine because the assessee failed to prosecute the appeal and rectify the defects. The Tribunal noted that the assessee was not interested in pursuing the matter.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the PCIT which was dismissed ex-parte. The assessee then filed an appeal before the ITAT with a delay, but failed to appear or rectify defects despite multiple opportunities. The assessee also did not appear before the PCIT.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed due to the assessee's failure to appear and prosecute the appeal. The issue also relates to the PCIT's ex-parte dismissal of the assessee's appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, HON’BLE & SHRI S BALAKRISHNAN, HON’BLE
अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant by : None प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent by : Dr.Satyasai Rath, CIT(DR) सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date of Hearing : 22.11.2023 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date of Pronouncement : 05.12.2023 आदेश /O R D E R Per Shri Duvvuru RL Reddy, Judicial Member :
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT), Vijayawada vide order dated 19.03.2020, arising out of order passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s.147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘Act’) dated 28.12.2017 for the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2010-11 with the delay of 132 days. It is evident Brookefield Infra Projects Pvt.Ltd, Vijayawada from the records that the assessee neither appeared before the PCIT nor before the Tribunal and filed condonation petition. The Ld.PCIT dismissed the appeal of the assessee ex-parte and directed the AO to re- examine the issues and complete the assessment denovo in accordance with law. The assessee filed appeal before the Tribunal against the order of the Ld.PCIT with the delay of 132 days and defect memo was issued and served on the assessee. It is observed from the order sheet notings that neither the assessee nor his representative has appeared before the Tribunal even through video conferencing on 24.03.2021, 28.04.2021, 16.06.2021, 16.09.2021, 16.02.2022, 11.05.2022, 27.09.2022, 22.11.2022, 31.01.2023, 28.03.2023, 03.05.2023, 14.06.2023, 22.11.2023 and the case was adjourned on various occasions. This Tribunal has given ample opportunities to rectify the defects mentioned in the memo. Hence, we conclude that the assessee is not interested to prosecute it’s appeal and thus, we dismiss the appeal filed by the assessee in-limine, since the assessee has not rectified the defects.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed in-limine.
Brookefield Infra Projects Pvt.Ltd, Vijayawada
Order pronounced in the open court on 5th December , 2023. (एस बालाकृष्णन) (दुव्वूरु आर.एल रेड्डी) (S.BALAKRISHNAN) (DUVVURU RL REDDY) लेखा सदस्य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER न्याधयक सदस्य/JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated : 05.12.2023 L.Rama, SPS
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026