KRITIKA SINGH,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, RANGE 4(2), LUCKNOW, LUCKNOW
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed for statistical purposes, with liberty to approach the Tribunal again if the Vivad Se Vishwas application is not accepted.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order for Assessment Year 2011-12. The assessee subsequently applied for withdrawal of the appeal, stating they had opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessee should be allowed to withdraw their appeal due to opting for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SMC BENCH, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SMC BENCH, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2011-12 Kritika Singh v. The Income Tax Officer F/301, Royal Classic Range 4(2) Next to City Mall Lucknow Andheri Link Road Andheri West, Mumbai TAN/PAN:AOCPS7479D (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by: None (Application for withdrawal of appeal) Respondent by: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, D.R. Date of hearing: 19 11 2024 Date of pronouncement: 19 11 2024 O R D E R
This appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 30.07.2021, passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi for Assessment Year 2011-12.
At the outset, it was noticed that the assessee has submitted an application dated 11.11.2024, received by the Registry of this Office on 12.11.2024, vide which it has been submitted that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 (DTVSV, 2024) and he has enclosed copy of Acknowledgement No.683790511071124 dated 07.11.2024. In Page 2 of 2 response to which, the Ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Lucknow (designated authority) has issued Form No.2 on 07.11.2024. The copy of form No.2 is placed on record. The prayer of the assessee was that in view of the above, he may be permitted to withdraw the appeal.
In view of the prayer made by the assessee, I permit the assessee to withdraw the appeal and the same is consigned to record with the liberty to the assessee to approach the Tribunal again in case the assessee’s application under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme is not finally accepted by the Department.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 19/11/2024.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026