M/S TJR PROPERTIES PVT. LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. ACIT, CC-2, CHANDIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessment proceedings under Section 153A were not valid as no search was conducted on the assessee company. It also deleted the additions made under Section 68 and the disallowance of depreciation, finding them to be unjustified and made without proper application of mind.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal concerns the assessment year 2016-17. The primary issue is whether the assessment proceedings under Section 153A were valid, as the assessee claims no search was conducted on its premises. Additionally, the appeal challenges additions made under Section 68 and disallowance of depreciation.
What were the issues?
The key issues are the validity of assessment proceedings initiated under Section 153A without a search, and the justification for additions made under Section 68 and disallowance of depreciation.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(8)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Kabul Chawla3,235 citing234 Taxmann 300 · 2016 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society1,589 citing96 Taxmann.com 468 · 2017 · SC
- Pr. CIT v. Meeta Gutgutia1,226 citing395 ITR 526 · 2017 · HC
- E.N. Gopakumar v. CIT428 citing75 Taxmann.com 215 · 2016 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Raj Kumar Arora253 citing367 ITR 517 · 2014 · HC
- Pr. CIT v. Meeta Gutgutia137 citing257 Taxmann 441 · 2018 · SC
- 361 ITR 4056 citing361 ITR 405 · HC
- Delhi in Alankar Saphire Developers v. Dy. CIT6 citing184 ITD 847 · 2020 · ITAT
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
आदेश/Order
PER A.D.JAIN, VICE PRESIDENT
This is assessee's appeal against the order dated 30.11.2022 of the ld.CIT (A)-3, Gurgaon pertaining to 2016- 17 assessment year.
The assessee has taken the following grounds of appeal:-
ITA 738/CHD/2022 A.Y. 2016-17 2
That the order of Learned C.I.T. (A) is bad and against the facts and Law.
That the learned C.I.T.(A) assessment completed u/s 153 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which is against the provisions of the law as neither any search was conduc
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026