RADISSON INDIA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION,GURGAON vs. CIT (EXEMPTINS), CHANDIGARH
No AI summary yet for this case.
आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण,च�डीगढ़ �यायपीठ, च�डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DIVISION BENCH, “B” CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos. 344 & 345/CHD/2023 �नधा�रण वष� / Assessment Year : 2023-24 Radisson India Charitable Foundation, Vs The CIT (Exemption), 1st Floor, Block-A Chimes, Chandigarh. Plot No.61, Sector 44, Gurgaon. �थायीलेखासं./PAN NO: AAETR3910L अपीलाथ�/Appellant ��यथ�/Respondent �नधा�रती क� ओर से/Assessee by: Shri Pradeep Dinodia, CA राज�व क� ओर से/ Revenue by : Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT, DR सुनवाई क� तार�ख/Date of Hearing : 14.02.2024 उदघोषणा क� तार�ख/Date of Pronouncement : 27.02.2024 HYBRID HEARING आदेश/Order Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member: The present appeal ( ITA 344/CHD/2023) has been preferred by the assessee Foundation agitating against the action of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh [hereinafter referred to as ‘ld.CIT(E)’] dated 29.03.2023 in rejecting the application of the assessee for final registration u/s 12A(1)(ac) (iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act) whereas ITA No. 345/CHD/2023 is relating to rejection of the application of the assessee for
ITA No.344 & 345/CHD/2023 A.Y. 2023-24 2 registration u/s 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act.
At the outset the ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the assessee was earlier granted provisional registration u/s 12A of the Act. Thereafter, the assessee applied for final registration whereupon the ld. CIT(E) raised certain queries which were duly replied by the assessee foundation. However, the ld. CIT(E) has rejected the application of the assessee without going through the reply and explanation given by the assessee alleging that the assessee has not given any reply/explanation. The ld. counsel has submitted that, in fact, the ld. CIT(E) has failed to take note of reply and evidences furnished by the assessee in response to the queries raised by the ld. CIT(E) and therefore, the rejection of the application of the assessee for final registration u/s 12A was not justified.
The ld. counsel has further invited our attention to the impugned order passed in relation to the application for registration u/s 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act wherein the application for registration u/s 80G(5) has been rejected on the ground of dismissal of application of the assessee for final registration u/s 12A of the Income Tax Act.
After considering the rival submissions and going through the record, in our view, the interest of justice will
ITA No.344 & 345/CHD/2023 A.Y. 2023-24 3 be well served if the assessee is given an opportunity to present its case before the ld. CIT(E). The impugned orders of the ld. CIT(E) in both the appeals are, therefore, set aside with a direction to decide both the applications of the assessee afresh after giving adequate opportunity to the assessee to present its case. Needless to say that the ld. CIT(E) will duly go through the details and evidences furnished by the assessee and thereafter, pass speaking orders in both the appeals. 5. The appeals of the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced 27 t h February,2024.
Sd/- Sd/- (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANJAY GARG) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER “Poonam” आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/ Copy of the order forwarded to : अपीलाथ�/ The Appellant 2.��यथ�/ The Respondent 3.आयकरआयु�त/ CIT 4. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य 1. आ�धकरण, च�डीगढ़/ DR, ITAT, CHANDIGARH 5. गाड�फाईल/ Guard File आदेशानुसार/ By order, सहायक पंजीकार/ Assistant Registrar
