No AI summary yet for this case.
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ “बी” , च"डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH “B”, CHANDIGARH HEARING THROUGH: HYBRID MODE "ी आकाश दीप जैन, उपा"य" एवं "ी िव"म "सह यादव, लेखा सद"य BEFORE: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN, VP & SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM आयकर अपील सं./ िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16 Ranjit Kumar Minhas बनाम The PCIT H.No. 324, Sec-21A, Chandigarh Chandigarh-1 Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AJAPM8426B अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent िनधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : None राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT, DR सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date of Hearing : 13/03/2024 उदघोषणा क" तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 15/03/2024 आदेश/Order PER VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M. :
This is an appeal filed by the Assessee against the order of the Ld. Pr. CIT, Chandigarh-1 dt. 14/03/2021 pertaining to Assessment Year 2015-16. 2. In the present appeal Assessee has raised the following revised grounds:
This appeal is being filed by the assessee against the order of Ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-Chandigarh-1(hereinafter called as CIT) passed u/s 263 dated 14.03.2021 for A.Y 2015-16: a. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) erred in initiating proceedings u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) vide show cause notice dated 20.02.2021 and passing an order u/s 263 of the Act as the reasons assigned by him for doing so are wrong and contrary to the facts of the case, the provisions of the Act, and the Rules made thereunder. b. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the appellant prays that the order of the learned CIT passed u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 may be cancelled being void ab-initio and bad in law.
The Appellant craves leave to add, amend, alter vary and / or withdraw any or all the above grounds of Appeal.
Briefly the facts of the case are that the assessment in this case was completed under section 143(3) dt. 30/11/2017 wherein the return of income filed by the assessee declaring income of Rs. 73,310/- was accepted. Thereafter the assessment record were called for and a show cause under section 263 was issued to the assessee on 20/02/2021. Subsequently after considering the submissions of the assessee, assessment order was held to be erroneous as well as prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue and it was set aside to the file of the AO to pass the same after making necessary inquiry / investigation in light of the discussion made in the impugned order and after giving due opportunity to the assessee.
Against the said findings and the direction of the Ld. PCIT, the assessee is in appeal before us. 5. During the course of hearing, none appeared on behalf of the assessee, however a communication dt. 05/03/2024 has been received from the assessee wherein it has been stated that pursuant to the impugned order under section 263 of the Act, the NFAC has since passed the order under section 144 r.w.s 263 r.w.s 144B dt. 29/03/2022 wherein the assessed income has been determined at Rs. 173310/- by making the addition of Rs. 1,00,000/- to the income originally assessed under section 143(3) amounting to Rs. 73,310/-. It was however submitted that while computing the tax demand the AO has wrongly computed the tax demand at Rs. 14,44,139/- by wrongly considering the income assessed in the order so passed under section 144 r.w.s 263 r.w.s 144B dt. 29/03/2022. 5.1 It was submitted that the assessee has subsequently filed the letter dt. 28/04/2022 stating that the order passed under section 144 r.w.s 263 r.w.s 144B has certain computational error and the same therefore deserves to be rectified. It was submitted that the said rectification has since not been done