MRS. KIRAN BALA,LUDHIANA vs. DCIT, CC-III, LUDHIANA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the surrendered income should be treated as business income, not unexplained investment under Sections 69A and 69B. Consequently, Section 115BBE was not applicable.
What were the facts?
During a survey, the assessee surrendered Rs. 24,25,000/- as income from excess stock, excess cash, and unexplained debtors. The Assessing Officer (AO) treated this as unexplained investment and money under Sections 69A and 69B, taxable under Section 115BBE.
What were the issues?
Whether surrendered income found during a survey, representing excess stock, cash, and debtors, can be treated as unexplained investment under Section 69A/69B or as business income. Applicability of Section 115BBE on such income.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(5)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Roshan Di Hatti v. CIT477 citing107 ITR 938 · 1977 · SC · Read judgment
- Chokshi Hiralal Maganlal v. DCIT54 citing131 TTJ 1 · 2010 · ITAT
- Kim Pharma (P) Ltd. v. CIT47 citing35 Taxmann.com 456 · 2013 · HC
- Principal Commissioner of Income Tax v. Deccan Jewellers Ltd.34 citing438 ITR 131 · 2021 · HC
- Famina Knit Fabs v. ACIT33 citing176 ITD 246 · 2019 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CHANDIGARH
Before: SHRI A.D.JAIN & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV
PER A.D.JAIN, VICE PRESIDENT
This is assessee's appeal for assessment year 2019-20
against the order dated 29.03.2023 passed by the ld. CIT(A)-
5, Ludhiana. The following grounds have been taken :
That the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred, in law as well as on facts in upholding the invocation of provisions of section 69A of the Act on the surrendered amount of Rs.24,25,000/- treating the same to be income from other sources as against declared business incom
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 69A
- Vishal Kumar Patel(HUF), Raipur vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), RaipurITA 595/RPR/2026[2017-18]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026