SANT SHIROMANI ICCHA PURTI SHRI BALAJI CHARITABLE TRUST,BALAJI COLONY, JAKHAL ROAD vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH, AAYAKAR BHAWAN

PDF · subscribers
ITA 572/CHANDI/2023Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh04 April 2024AY 2023-24Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that merely uploading a notice on the Income Tax Portal does not constitute effective service. The matter was set aside to allow the assessee a proper opportunity to present its case.

What were the facts?

The assessee's application for registration under Section 80G(5) was rejected by the CIT(E). The assessee contended that the rejection was ex-parte and no proper notice of hearing was served.

What were the issues?

Whether the rejection of the application was valid without proper service of notice and an opportunity of hearing to the assessee.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80G(5),Section 282

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Order PER VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M. : The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order passed by the Id. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh dated 26/07/2023.

1.

The assessee in this appeal has contested the action of the ld. CIT(E) in rejecting 2. the application of the assessee for registration u/s 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act').

3.

At the outset, the Id. Counsel for the assessee has invited our attention to the impugned order of the Id. CIT(E) to submit that the same is an ex-parte order. He has submitted that the ld. CIT(E) has summarily rejected the application of the assessee without giving an opportunity of hearing to the assessee to present its case. He has submitted that no notice of date of hearing was served by the ld. CIT(E), either through physical mode, through e-mail or registered post etc. That the notice of date of hearing was allegedly uploaded on Income Tax Portal and the assessee was not aware of uploading of any such notice regarding date of hearing. Referring to Rule 127(2)(b), it was submitted that for communication delivered or transmitted electronically, it is essential that the same be addressed at the email address of the assessee and which has not happened in the instant case. It was accordingly submitted that no service of notice was ever affected on the assessee and therefore, in interest of justice, the assessee be allowed an opportunity to represent its case and the matter be remanded to the file of ld CIT(E) to decide the same afresh after providing opportunity to the assessee.

The Id. DR has relied on the order of the ld CIT(E), at the same time, has not 4. expressed any reservation where the matter is remitted back to the file of the ld CIT(E) for fresh consideration.

5.

We have heard the rival contentions and purused the material available on record. Merely uploading of notice about the scheduled date of hearing on the Income Tax Portal is not an effective service of notice as per the provisions of Section 282 of the Income Tax Act read with Rule 127(2)(b) of Income tax Rules. The same is hereby set aside with a direction to the ld. CIT(E) to decide the appeal of the assessee afresh after giving proper and adequate opportunity to the assessee to present its case. The Id. CIT (E) will serve notice of hearing on the assessee through physical mode as well as through electronic mode on the email address provided by the assessee. The assessee will participate in the proceedings and submit necessary information and documentation as called for and as advised.

6.

The appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open Court on 04/04/2024.

More judgments on Section 80G(5)

All 2,236 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80G(5) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →