MANDEEP SINGH DANG,PANCHKULA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), CHANDIGARH
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's application to withdraw the appeal as the subsequent assessment order rendered the appeal infructuous. The Revenue had no objection to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed under Section 263. Subsequently, a fresh assessment order under Section 143(3) was passed, making no additions after considering the assessee's arguments and evidence.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal becomes infructuous when a subsequent assessment order addresses the issues raised in the appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CHANDIGARH
Before: SHRI A.D.JAIN & SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY
आदेश/ORDER
PER A.D.JAIN, VICE PRESIDENT
This is assessee's appeal for assessment year 2018-19 against the order dated 27.03.2023 passed by the ld. Pr.CIT, Chandigarh.
The ld. counsel for the assessee has filed an Application dated 08.04.2024 seeking permission to withdraw the appeal. The contents of the withdrawal application are reproduced hereunder:
“Kindly refer to the matter cited as subject above. The appellant above cited filed appeal before the Hon'ble Bench against the order passed u/s 263 by the Worthy PCIT-1, Chandigarh. We are now most respectfully ITA 19/CHD/2024 A.Y.2018-19 2 submitting that the assessment order u/s 143(3), consequent to revisionary order u/s 263, has been passed by the Ld. AO wherein no. addition has been made after considering the arguments and evidences filed by the assessee. This, in our humble submission, has rendered the subject appeal as infructuous. Copy of the assessment order passed is attached herewith. It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed that the permission may please be granted for withdrawal of the subject appeal with a liberty to get the appeal revived, if the department intends to re-open the assessment at any future date. We shall be highly obliged.”
The ld. DR has posed no objection to the request of the assessee.
In view of the above facts and circumstances, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Said order was pronounced in the Open Court at the time of hearing itself.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 16.04.2024.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026