M/S PUNJAB SMALL INDUSTRIES AND EXPORTS CORPORATION LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. ACIT, CIRCLE (1), CHANDIGARH
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee requested to withdraw the appeal due to a subsequent assessment order accepting the originally assessed income. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order of the PCIT. During the hearing, the assessee moved an application to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee should be allowed to withdraw the appeal after a subsequent assessment order was passed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Order PER PARESH M. JOSHI, J.M. : This is an appeal by the Assessee against the order of the Ld. PCIT, Chandigarh-1 dt. 24/03/2023. 2. During the course of hearing the Ld. Counsel for the Assessee moved an application to withdraw the appeal, contents of which reads as under:
Sub: Request tor withdrawal of appeal in the eases of M/s Punjab Small Industries and Export Corp. Ltd. I.T.A. No.: 3I5/Chandi-2023. A.Y. : 2018-19 Dated of hearing: 08.04.2024 Kindly refer to the above-mentioned appeal which is fixed for hearing before the Hon'ble Bench for 08.04.2024. It is submitted that in the assessment order dated 27.03.2024. under Section 143(3) read with Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has been passed by the Ld. DCIT/ACIT. Circle 1(1), Chandigarh, the Id. Assessing Officer has accepted the originally assessed income under order dated 26.03.2021, under Section 143(3) read with Section I43(3A)&143(3B), passed by the Ld. Additional Joint Deputy Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, National e-Assessment Centre, Delhi in the ease of the" appellant. The copy assessment order dated 27.03.2024, under Section 143(3) read with Section 263 passed by the Ed. DCIT/ACIT, Circle 1(1), Chandigarh is enclosed herewith.
In view of the above facts, it is humbly prayed that undersigned may kindly be allowed to withdraw the appeal.
Ld. DR did not object if the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
We have heard the rival contention and perused the material available on the record. We find that the assessee requested to withdraw his appeal for which he has submitted the withdrawal application which is placed on record. After considering the request so made by the assessee and hearing the Ld. DR the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeal of the Assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026