INDEPTH VISION FOUNDATION,AMBALA vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

PDF
ITA 460/CHANDI/2023Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh09 May 2024AY 2022-23Bench: SHRI A.D.JAIN (Vice President), SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)4 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CHANDIGARH

Before: SHRI A.D.JAIN & SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY

For Appellant: Shri Tej Mohan Singh, Advocate
For Respondent: Shri Rohit Sharma, CIT DR
Hearing: 08.05.2024Pronounced: 09.05.2024

आदेश/ORDER

PER A.D.JAIN, VICE PRESIDENT

This is assessee's appeal for assessment year 2022-23 against the order dated 20.06.2023 passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh [in short ‘the ld. CIT(E)’].

2.

The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:

“1. That the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) has erred in law rejecting the approval sought under section 8iKLholding it to be not maintainable which is arbitrary and unjustified. 2. That the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax has erred in law as well as on facts in rejecting the approval sought under section 80G of the Act ,only

ITA 460/CHD/2023 A.Y.2022-23 2 on the basis that the application was not filed within the time limit prescribed in respect of application filed under clause (iii) of first proviso to sub-section (5) of Section 80G which is arbitrary & unjustified.

3.

The facts of the case are that the assessee filed application

for registration of the Trust u/s 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act,

1961 on 28.12.2022 electronically in Form No.10AB under Rule

11AA of the IT Rules. A notice was issued to the assessee on

03.02.2023 through ITBA Portal to specify the date of

commencement of activities as well as details/documents, etc. In

response to the notice, the assessee furnished certain

details/documents on 18.02.2023. On considering all the facts,

the application of the assessee Trust for final registration u/s

80G of the Income Tax Act was rejected on the ground of

limitation.

4.

The assessee Foundation was earlier granted provisional

registration. However, the final registration of the assessee

Trust was rejected by the ld.CIT(E) observing that as per

clause (iii) of first proviso to sub-section (5) of Section 80G

of the Act, the assessee Trust was required to apply for final

registration atleast six months prior to the expiry of the

period of provisional approval or within six months of

commencement of its activities, whichever is earlier.

5.

The ld.CIT(E) observed that the last date for application

which was extended upto 30.09.2023 vide CBDT Circular

ITA 460/CHD/2023 A.Y.2022-23 3 No.6/2023 dated 24.05.2023. Vide notice/letter dated

03.02.2023, the assessee was requested to state the date of

commencement of activities. In response to the same, the

assessee filed its submissions electronically on 18.03.2023

submitting that its activities were commenced on

23.01.2021. In re ply to another notice dated 01.06.2023,

sent by the ld. CIT(E), the asse ssee submitted vide reply

dated 11.06.2023 that after commencement of the activity,

the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic began and

lockdown was announced by the Governme nt during that

period. The assessee submitted that after things got

normalized, they started charitable activities and also

applied for the provisional registration of 80G on

25.11.2021. The CIT(E) observed that the application filed in

Form No.10AB under Clause (iii) of first proviso to sub-

section (5) of the Act was not filed within the time limit as

extended from time to time by the CBDT. Accordingly, the ld.

CIT (E) rejected the application of the assessee as non

maintainable.

6.

Aggrieved the assessee is in appeal before this

Tribunal.

7.

We have heard the parties and have perused the

material on record. The CBDT vide Circular 7/2024 dated

25.04.2024 has extended the due date for filing of Form No.

ITA 460/CHD/2023 A.Y.2022-23 4 10A/10AB under the Income Tax Act, 1961 till 30.06.2024.

In view of the facts and circumstances, the impugned order

of the ld.CIT(E) is, therefore, set aside and the matter is

restored to the file of the CIT(E) to decide the application of

the assessee for final registration on merits after giving

adequate opportunity to the assessee to present its case,

irrespective of the fact that there was any delay in filing the

application.

8.

The appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for

statistical purposes.

Order pronounced on 09.05.2024.

Sd/- Sd/- (KRINWANT SAHAY) (A.D.JAIN ) ACCOUNTANTMEMBER VICE PRESIDENT

“Poonam”

आदेश क� �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/ Copy of the order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ�/ The Appellant 2. ��यथ�/ The Respondent 3. आयकर आयु�/ CIT 4. िवभागीय �ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय आिधकरण, च�डीगढ़/ DR, ITAT, CHANDIGARH 5. गाड� फाईल/ Guard File आदेशानुसार/ By order, सहायक पंजीकार/ Assistant Registrar

INDEPTH VISION FOUNDATION,AMBALA vs CIT (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH | BharatTax