CHHATTISGARH STATE CRICKET SANGH,RAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), RAIPUR
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee requested to withdraw the appeals due to the subsequent rectification and refund. The revenue did not object to the withdrawal request.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against an order passed by the CIT(Appeals). Subsequently, a rectification order was passed by the AO, and a refund was issued to the assessee.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee can withdraw their appeal after a rectification order has been passed and a refund issued.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAIPUR BENCH, RAIPUR
Before: SHRI RAVISH SOOD & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA
आदेश / ORDER
PER RAVISH SOOD, JM :
The captioned appeals filed by the assessee trust/society are directed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Center (NFAC), Delhi, dated 18.05.2022, which in turn arises from the order passed by the A.O. under Sec. 154 r.w.s. 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) dated 03.07.2020 for the assessment year 2017-18.
At the very outset, Shri Praveen Jain, the Ld. Authorized Representative (for short ‘AR’) for the assessee submitted that as per instruction the assessee trust/society wants to withdraw the captioned appeals. Our attention was drawn by the Ld. AR to a letter dated 03.07.2023, wherein it was requested that permission be granted to withdraw the aforesaid appeals. The contents of the letter dated 03.07.2023 reads as under:
“With reference to the above assessee, appeal was filed before the Hon. Bench vide application dated 13.07.2022. However subsequent to filing of Appeal before the Hon. Bench, Rectification Order has been passed on 21.10.2022 and refund has been passed. It is therefore requested before your honour to kindly allow ‘withdrawal of the Appeal. Kindly accord your approval for “withdrawal of the Appeal.”
3 Chhattisgarh State Cricket Sangh Vs. CIT, NFAC, Delhi & 135/RPR/2022
Per contra, the Ld. Departmental Representative (for short 'DR') did not raise any objection to the seeking of withdrawal of the appeals by the assessee.
Considering the aforesaid concession of the Ld. AR who as per the instruction of the assessee has sought to withdraw the captioned appeals, which had not been objected by the department, we herein permit the same.
Resultantly, the appeals filed by the assessee trust/society are dismissed as withdrawn.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026