PARIVARTAN SOCIETY,PUNJAB vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - EXEMPTIONS, CHANDIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal set aside the order of the CIT (Exemptions) and remanded the matter back for fresh adjudication. The CIT was directed to provide a reasonable opportunity to the assessee to present their case.
What were the facts?
The assessee society applied for registration under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act. The CIT (Exemptions) dismissed the application as non-maintainable without providing further opportunity to the assessee.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT (Exemptions) erred in dismissing the application for 80G registration without affording a proper opportunity to the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CHANDIGARH
Before: SHRI A.D.JAIN & SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY
आदेश/ORDER
PER A.D.JAIN, VICE PRESIDENT
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of ld. CIT(Exemption) Chandigarh dated 17.01.2024 pertaining to assessment year 2024-25.
During the courses of hearing, the ld. AR submitted that the assessee had moved an application u/s 80G of the Income Tax Act before the ld. CIT (Exemption) electronically
ITA 103/CHD/2024 A.Y. 2024-25 2 on the ITBA Portal on 11.08.2023. A notice was issued to the assessee on 22.09.2023 through ITBA Portal to specify the date of commencement of activities by the Society as well as details/documents etc. In response to the said notice, the assessee filed reply vide letter dated 14.12.2023 alongwith annexures. Thereafter, vide impugned order dated 17.01.2024, the application of the assessee has been dismissed holding it to be as non-maintainable. The ld. Counsel for the assessee stated that without providing any further opportunity, the matter has been decided ex-parte qua the assessee and the application filed by the assessee has been rejected. It was, accordingly, submitted that the assessee may be allowed an opportunity and the matter may be set aside to the file of the ld. CIT (Exemption) to decide the same afresh.
The ld. DR has not raised any objection to the request of the assessee.
After hearing both the parties and considering the material on record, the matter is set aside to the file of ld. CIT (Exemption) to decide the same afresh after providing reasonable opportunity to the assessee. Needless to say, the assessee shall attend to the proceedings and file necessary
ITA 103/CHD/2024 A.Y. 2024-25 3 information and documentation as called for by the ld. CIT (Exemption).
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026
- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Sml LTD vs. Mohan And Company And AnotherHimachal Pradesh · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Umer Enterprises vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And AnotherAllahabad · 15 Oct 2026