LATE SMT.CHANDANBEN S. SHAH, L/H SMT. HANSABEN BIHARILAL SHAH,RAJKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(2), RAJKOT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as not maintainable because the assessee's legal heir was not interested in pursuing it. There was a lack of documentation and no effort to condone the delay.
What were the facts?
The legal heir of the assessee sought to withdraw the appeal due to the death of the previous legal heir and the current legal heir residing abroad. The appeal was filed with a significant delay and had been adjourned multiple times.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal can be dismissed due to the lack of interest from the legal heir and the absence of proper documentation to pursue the case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT
Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED & SHRI T. R. SENTHIL KUMAR
PER T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This is an appeal filed by the legal heir of the assessee aggrieved against the order dated 10.05.2016 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Rajkot (in short “CIT(A)”) as against the assessment order dated 28.03.2013 passed under Section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to the Assessment Year 2008-09.
This appeal is filed by the legal heir Smt. Hansaben Biharilal Shah with a delay of 421 days in filing this appeal. When the matter was listed - 2 - Late Smt. Chandanben S. Shah vs. ITO Asst.Year – 2008-09 for hearing today for 11th time, Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted a letter dated 01.09.2022 requesting to permit to withdraw the Letter of Authority in its favour for the reason that the legal heir namely Hansaben Shah also died on 09.05.2021 leaving her son Shri Bhavik Shah as a legal heir, who is citizen of USA. Several efforts made to contact through email to Hansaben Shah is also not responding to the Authorized Representative’s emails. Under the above circumstances the Authorized Representative pleaded they do not have valid Letter of Authority and therefore, seek permission to withdraw the Letter of Authority.
Though, the case pending on the file of this tribunal from 2017 and more than ten hearings, the legal heir of the assessee has not chosen to pursue the appeal by condoning the delay of 421 days, however, sought for adjournment from time to time. There is no material placed by way of Paper Book before us to adjudicate the appeal and substantiate the grounds of appeals raised by the assessee. In the absence of the same we have no option to conclude that the assessee’s legal heir is not interested in pursuing this appeal. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed as not maintainable in law.
4. In the result, the appeal preferred by the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the Court on 28.09.2022 at Ahmedabad.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026