INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD -3(5), NAGPUR vs. M/S RAMTEK NAGRIK SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA MARYADIT, NAGPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeals were not maintainable as they did not fall under the exceptions provided in the CBDT Circular regarding monetary limits. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed five appeals before the ITAT against orders passed by the CIT(A) for various assessment years. The tax effect in these appeals was below the monetary limit fixed by a CBDT Circular.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the Revenue's appeals were maintainable given that the tax effect was below the prescribed monetary limit set by the CBDT.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, NAGPUR
Before: SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI
आदेश / ORDER PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JM :
All the above five appeals by the Revenue against the separate orders dated 12-12-2018 and 18-02-2019 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Nagpur [‘CIT(A)’] for assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11, 2012-13 and 2013-14, respectively.
Admittedly, the tax effect involved in these five appeals are below monetary limit fixed by the CBDT Circular vide its latest Circular No. 17/2019, dated 08-08-2019 and are not falling under the exceptions provided under the above said circular. Thus, grounds raised by the Revenue in these five appeals fail and all the appeals are not maintainable. Therefore, all the five appeals of Revenue are dismissed as withdrawn in terms of CBDT Circular mentioned here-in-above, with a liberty to file appropriate application for restoration of appeals to the file.
In the result, all the five appeals of Revenue are dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 29th September, 2022. Sd/- (S.S. Viswanethra Ravi) JUDICIAL MEMBER पुणे / Pune; दिनाांक / Dated : 29th September, 2022. रदव आदेश की प्रविविवि अग्रेविि / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलार्थी / The Appellant. 1. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent. 2.
3. The CIT(A)-2, Nagpur 4. The Pr. CIT-2, Nagpur धिभागीय प्रधिधनधि, आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, “एक सदस्य मामला” बेंच, 5. नागपुर / DR, ITAT, “SMC” Bench, Nagpur. गार्ड फ़ाइल / Guard File. 6. //सत्यादपत प्रदत// True Copy// आिेशानुसार / BY ORDER,
वररष्ठ दनजी सदिव / Sr. Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अदिकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026