A V. MEMON,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CEN CIR 45, MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The Departmental Representative had no objection to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against orders passed by the Assessing Officer under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee subsequently submitted letters requesting to withdraw these appeals.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals should be granted.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “A”, MUMBAI
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
The captioned appeals filed by the assessee are directed against a common order of the CIT(A)-38, Mumbai dated 28/03/2013, pertaining to the assessment years 2004-05 to 2008-09, which in turn has arisen from orders passed by the Assessing Officer dated 30/06/2011 under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’).
The assessee has filed five separate letters in respect of all the appeals, which are dated 21st September, 2015. All the letters are similarly worded, except difference in ITA Nos.& Assessment Years. The contents of the letter submitted in respect of 2004-05 read as under:-
“ Re: A V Menon (‘Appellant’) Assessment Year (‘AY' ) :2004-05 ITA 4830/Mu/2013(Assessee’s Appeal) –‘A’-Bench. Sub:- Withdrawal of appeal. I refer to the above appeal filed against the order under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 passed by the Hon’ble Commissioner of Income Tax- 38 dated 28 March 2013 scheduled for hearing on 8 October 2015. In this connection, I do not wish to pursue the appeal and hence request your Honours to kindly permit me to withdraw the appeal and oblige. Inconvenience caused to your Honours is highly regretted.”
Ld. Departmental Representative did not have any objection to such request for withdrawal of the appeals. Therefore, after hearing both the parties, the appeals were permitted to be withdrawn. Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
The above decision was pronounced in the open court in the presence of both the parties at the conclusion of the hearing on 08/10/2015.
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S New Sana Brick Field vs. Union Of INDIA And 4 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Vinay Singh vs. Union Of INDIAAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Aaradhyam Infrabuilders PVT LTD vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026