BANSI S. MEHTA & CO.,MUMBAI vs. JCIT CIR 11(2), MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal considered the rival submissions and allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee is aggrieved by an order upholding the disallowance of interest paid to partners. The assessee requested to withdraw the appeal due to the smallness of the amount involved.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn upon the assessee's request and the revenue's no objection.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCHES “B”, MUMBAI
Before: Shri Joginder Singh, & Shri Rajesh Kumar
Per Joginder Singh (Judicial Member) The assessee is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 07/10/2011 of the ld. First Appellate Authority, Mumbai, upholding the disallowance of a sum of Rs.1,34,368/- out of the interest paid to the partners of Rs.31,71,998/- invoking proviso to section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter the Act).
2 Bansi S Mehta & Company
During hearing, the ld. counsel for the assessee, Ms. K.R. Gandhi, requested the Bench to grant permission to withdraw the appeal due to smallness of amount involved. The ld. DR, Shri Vijay Kumar Soni, had no objection to the request of the assessee.
2.1. We have considered the rival submissions and perused the material available on record. In view of the above, since, the assessee wants to withdraw its appeal and the ld. DR had no objection, if the appeal of the assessee is permitted to be withdrawn, we dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn.
Finally, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
This Order was pronounced in the open court in the presence of ld. representatives from both sides at the conclusion of the hearing on 21/10/2015.
More judgments on Section 36(1)(iii)
- Hcy Industrial Parks Private Limited, Mumbai vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department…ITA 1899/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Hcy Industrial Parks Private Limited, Mumbai vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department…ITA 1899/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shah Brothers, West Singhbhum vs ACIT/DCIT, Cen Cir-1, RanchiITA 239/RAN/2026[2017-2018]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2017-2018
- Ami Industries, Surendranagar vs The ITO Ward 1, SurendranagarITA 148/RJT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Ami Industries, Surendranagar vs The ITO Ward 1, SurendranagarITA 148/RJT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026