No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “G” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY & SHRI ASHWANI TANEJA
This is an appeal by the Revenue against the order dated 25th October 2013, passed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals)-39, Mumbai, deleting penalty imposed under section 271AAA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short "the Act") for the assessment year 2009–10.
We have heard the parties and perused the material on record. A search and seizure operation under section 132 of the Act was M/s. Ganraya Land Pvt. Ltd. 2 conducted in case of Jai Corp and Associates within the group including the assessee. On the basis of search and seizure operation, assessment proceedings in case of the assessee was initiated and in the course of assessment proceedings on the basis of documents found as a result of search, the Assessing Officer made addition of ` 1,58,22,000 as unexplained expenditure under section 69C of the Act. On the basis of the aforesaid addition, proceeding for imposition of penalty under section 271AAA was initiated alleging concealment of income and furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income. Ultimately, the Assessing Officer passed an order under section 271AAA of the Act imposing penalty of ` 15,82,200, being 10% of the undisclosed income. Being aggrieved of the penalty order, the assessee preferred an appeal before the first appellate authority.
In the course of hearing of appeal before the first appellate authority, it was submitted by the assessee that the addition made under section 69C of the Act in the mean while has been deleted by the Tribunal while deciding assessee’s quantum appeal. The learned Commissioner (Appeals), after perusing the order of the Tribunal, deleting the addition made under section 69C of the Act in order dated 22nd March 2013, passed in ITA no.8237/Mum./2011 and others, deleted the penalty.
M/s. Ganraya Land Pvt. Ltd. 3 4. Undisputedly, in the present case, the addition made on the basis of which penalty was imposed under section 271AAA, has been deleted by the Tribunal while deciding assessee’s quantum appeal. Therefore, the very basis on which penalty was imposed, no more exist. That being the case, imposition of penalty under section 271AAA will also not survive.
In the aforesaid view of the matter, we do not find any infirmity in the order of the learned Commissioner (Appeals) in cancelling the penalty under section 271AAA. Thus, the grounds raised by the Department are dismissed.
In the result, Revenue’s appeal is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open Court on 30.10.2015