ACIT CC 39, MUMBAI vs. GANESH REALTY P.LTD, NAVI MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the addition itself had been deleted by the Tribunal in the quantum proceedings. Therefore, the penalty levied on that addition had no basis.
What were the facts?
The revenue appealed against a penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2008-09. The penalty was based on an addition made under section 69C.
What were the issues?
Whether penalty under section 271(1)(c) can be sustained when the underlying addition has been deleted in quantum proceedings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “G”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA & SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR
ITA No. : 597/Mum/2014 (Assessment year: 2008-09) Asst Commissioner of Income Tax Vs M/s Ganesh Realty P Ltd, CC 39/Cent Cir 6(4), DN 215, Second Floor, R. No. 32(1), Ground Floor, Plot no. 6, Sector 11, Aayakar Bhavan, Dronagiri -400 702 �थयी लेखा सं.:PAN: AACCG 7367 B M K Road, Mumbai -400 020 अपीलाथ� (Appellant) ��यथ� (Respondent) Appellant by Shri Rajesh Ojha Shankar : Respondent by : Shri Ramesh Jain सुनवाई क� तार�ख /Date of Hearing : 04-11-2015 घोषणा क� तार�ख /Date of Pronouncement : 04-11-2015 आदेश ORDER अिमत शु�ला, �या. स.: PER AMIT SHUKLA, JM: The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the revenue against impugned order dated 30.10.2011, passed by CIT(A)-41, Mumbai, in relation to the penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2008-09. The revenue is mainly aggrieved by levy of penalty of Rs. 19,55,970/- on account of addition made u/s 69C of Rs. 63,30,000/-.
At the outset, it has been admitted by the parties that in the quantum proceedings, the Tribunal vide order dated 22.03.2013 in & 8156/Mum/2011 has deleted the said addition.
In view of the aforesaid fact that the addition itself has been deleted by the Hon’ble Tribunal in the quantum proceedings, the 2 M/s Ganesh Realty P Ltd CIT(A) stands confirmed.
In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 4th November, 2015.
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026