THE ACIT, KOCHI vs. M/S.COCHIN AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE CO. LTD, KOCHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, appeals with a tax effect below Rs. 50 lakhs should not be filed before the ITAT. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as not maintainable.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order of the CIT(A) for AY 2006-07. The tax effect in the appeal was less than Rs. 50 lakhs.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable before the ITAT given the tax effect and CBDT Circular No. 17/2019.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN
Before: Shri George Mathan, JM & Shri Ramit Kochar, AM
This is an appeal filed by the Revenue against the order of the learned CIT(A)–1, Kochi in appeal No. ITA 3/R-I/E/CIT-(A)-I/2012-13 dated 16.12.2019 for AY 2006-07.
At the very outset, it is observed that the tax effect in the appeal filed by the Revenue is less than Rs.50 lakhs, and therefore, the Circular No. 17/2019 dated 8th August, 2019, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in exercise of its power vested under Sec. 268A of the I.T. Act comes into play, wherein, the monetary limit for filing the appeal(s) by the Revenue before the ITAT and various High Courts as well as Apex Court are revised with an object of reducing the tax litigation. Vide para 2 of the said circular (supra), it is stated that in cases where the tax effect in the appeal to be filed before the Appellate Tribunal does not exceed Rs. 50 lakhs, appeal should not be filed. Thus, taking a note of CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 dated 8th August, 2019 and considering the fact that the tax effect in the instant appeal is less than Rs.50 lakhs, the present appeal
2 M/s. Cochin Aircraft Maintenance Co. Ltd. deserves to be dismissed, as not maintainable. However, we make it clear that the issue(s) raised in the instant appeal is left open to be examined in the appropriate proceedings, if arises, in future. At the same time, we also make it clear that if the appeal falls in any of the exceptions referred to in the above said CBDT Circular, the Revenue is at liberty to move an application for recalling the order, if so, advised.
Accordingly in the light of CBDT Circular No.17/2019 dated 08th August, 2019, the appeal stands dismissed.
Dictated and pronounced in the open Court on 23rd February, 2022.
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026