A.C.I.T CIR - NADIA., NADIA vs. NADIA DISTRICT CENT CO- OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NADIA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the matter to the file of the CIT(A) to adjudicate afresh. This was to ensure fair play and justice by obtaining a remand report from the Assessing Officer.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed an order from the CIT(A) which was passed without obtaining comments from the Assessing Officer (AO) despite multiple requests. The assessee's submissions were considered by the CIT(A) in the absence of the AO's response.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in passing an order without obtaining a remand report from the AO. The need for proper adjudication after considering all reports.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH “B” KOLKATA
Before: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri Waseem Ahmed
आदेश /O R D E R
PER Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Member:-
This appeal by the Revenue is arising out of order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-XXXVI, Kolkata in appeal No.373/CIT(A)- XXXVI/Kol/R.Nadia/10-11/1758 dated 04.12.2012. Assessment was framed by JCIT, Range-Nadia, u/s 143(3) r.w.s 115WE(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) vide his order dated 24.12.2010 for assessment year 2008-09.
At the outset it was observed that the assessee has made the submission to the Ld. CIT(A) against the order of AO. The Ld. CIT(A) has forwarded the submission of assessee to the Assessing Officer for his A.Y. 2008-09 ACIT Cir-Nadia v. nadia Dist. Cent Co-Op. Bank Ltd. Page 2 “comments” vide letters dated 28.05.2012, 03.07.2012 and 05.10.2012. However, there was no compliance on the part of AO. Therefore Ld. CIT(A) decided the issue on the basis of submission of Ld. AR of assessee and materials available on record without waiting for the reply of the AO.
Ld. DR requested the Bench that the matter should be restored to the file of Ld. CIT(A) as the appellate order passed by Ld. CIT(A) is without having the remand report from the AO. The Ld. AR did not object on the pray of the Ld. DR for restoring the matter to the CIT(A). Therefore, in the interest of justice and fair play, we are inclined to restore the matter to the file of Ld. CIT(A) with direction to adjudicate the matter afresh after getting the remand report from the Assessing Officer on record and adjudicate the appeal as per law.
More judgments on Section 115WE(3)
- Gtn Textiles Limited, Ernakulam vs DCIT Corporate Cir 1(1) Kochi, ErnakulamITA 807/COCH/2025[2006-07]Status: Disposed21 Nov 2025AY 2006-07
- Mascot Industries, Kannur vs DCIT Circle 1(1), KannurITA 359/COCH/2023[2006-07]Status: Disposed27 Sept 2024AY 2006-07
- The DCIT, Circle-1(1)(1), Baroda vs Gujarat State Electricity Corporation Ltd…ITA 3367/AHD/2014[2007-08]Status: Disposed26 Sept 2024AY 2007-08
- M/S. Prakash Industries Ltd., New Delhi vs Addl. CIT, HisarITA 349/DEL/2010[2006-07]Status: Disposed5 Jan 2024AY 2006-07
- Bilfinger Neo Structo Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly… vs The ACIT, Circle-1, SuratITA 1101/AHD/2015[2006-07]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2022AY 2006-07
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026