AISHA AFATAB PATEL,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 13, MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the quantum additions, which formed the basis for the penalty, were set aside for fresh assessment, the penalty was not sustainable. Therefore, the penalty was deleted.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against the penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The penalty was based on quantum additions made by the Assessing Officer.
What were the issues?
Whether a penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) is sustainable when the underlying additions forming its basis have been set aside for fresh assessment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “A”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI RAJENDRA & SHRI SANJAY GARG
Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:
The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 18.02.2014 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [(hereinafter referred to as CIT(A)] relevant to assessment year 2003-04.
The assessee has agitated the action of the Ld. CIT(A) in confirming the penalty levied by the Assessing Officer (hereinafter referred to as the AO) under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. At the outset, the Ld. A.R. has stated that in relation to quantum additions, the matter has been set aside to the file of the AO by the Tribunal vide order dated 08.02.2015 passed in & 793/M/2010 for decision afresh. Since the very basis upon which the penalty was levied has ceased to exist, therefore, the consequential penalty is not sustainable in the eyes of law and the same is accordingly ordered to be deleted.
However, before parting with the order it is clarified that if the AO will find during the fresh assessment proceedings that the case of the assessee is also fit for levy of penalty in terms of the fresh assessment order, he will be at liberty to initiate fresh penalty proceedings accordingly.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is hereby allowed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 09.12.2015. आदेश क� घोषणा खुले �यायालय म� �दनांकः 09.12.2015 को क� गई । Sd/- Sd/- (राजे�� / Rajendra) (संजय गग� / Sanjay Garg) लेखा सद�य / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER �या�यक सद�य / JUDICIAL MEMBER मुंबई/Mumbai; �दनांक/Dated 09.12.2015 * Kishore आदेश क� ��त आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत आदेश क� ��त आदेश क� ��त �ल�प अ�े�षत �ल�प अ�े�षत/Copy of the Order forwarded �ल�प अ�े�षत Copy of the Order forwarded Copy of the Order forwarded to Copy of the Order forwarded to to : to 1. अपीलाथ� / The Appellant 2. ��यथ� / The Respondent. 3. आयकर आयु�त(अपील) / The CIT(A)- आयकर आयु�त / CIT 4. 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, मुंबई / The DR Concerned Bench, 6. गाड� फाईल / Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, आदेशानुसार आदेशानुसार आदेशानुसार स�या�पत ��त //True Copy//
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sahoo Supply Agency,Balasore vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs,New DelhiOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Jyoti Consultants, Agrahat vs. Pr. Commissioner GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, BhubaneswarOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Sahoo Supply Agency vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And CustomsOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- Gopal Aromatic PVT. LTD., Cuttack vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Nourangi Paints vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026