GARG FURNACE LIMITED,LUDHIANA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUDHIANA

PDF
ITA 383/CHANDI/2024Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh19 September 2024AY 2018-19Bench: SHRI A.D.JAIN (Vice President), SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)3 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CHANDIGARH

Before: SHRI A.D.JAIN & SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY

For Appellant: Shri Ashwani Kumar, C.A
For Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, JCIT, Sr.DR
Hearing: 11.09.2024Pronounced: 19.09.2024

आदेश/ORDER

PER A.D.JAIN, VICE PRESIDENT

This is assessee's appeal for assessment year 2018-19

against the order dated 17.02.2024 passed by the ld.

CIT(Appeals)-5, Ludhiana. The following grounds have been

taken : 1. That order passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-5, Ludhiana is against law and facts on the file in as much as he was not justified to decide the appeal ex-parte.

ITA 383/CHD/2024 A.Y.2018-19 2 2. That he has gravely erred in deciding the appeal without considering the reply filed by the appellant which was uploaded on 16.02.2024 i.e. the day of hearing.

2.

The ld. Counsel for the assessee has invited our

attention to the impugned order of the ld.CIT(A) to submit

that the ld. CIT(A) has passed an ex-parte order qua the

assessee; that the ld.CIT(A) has rejected the appeal of the

assessee without giving sufficient opportunity of hearing to

the assessee to present its case; that no notice of date of

hearing was served by the ld.CIT(A) upon the assessee, either

through physical mode or through e-mail etc.; that the ld.

CIT(A) did not consider the reply dated 16.02.2024 filed by

the assessee and passed the impugned ex-parte order; that

the notice of date of hearing was allegedly uploaded on

Income Tax Portal and no service of notice was ever

affected on the assessee.

4.

The ld. DR could not rebut the aforesaid factual

position.

5.

We have heard the rival contentions. Merely

uploading of information about the date of hearing on

the Income Tax Portal is not an effective service of notice

as per the provisions of Section 282 of the Income Tax

ITA 383/CHD/2024 A.Y.2018-19 3 Act. The impugned order of the ld.CIT(A) is, therefore,

not sustainable in the eyes of law. The same is hereby

set aside with a direction to the ld.CIT(A) to decide the

appeal of the assessee afresh after giving proper and

adequate opportunity to the assessee to present its case.

The ld. CIT (A) will serve notice of hearing through

physical mode as well as through electronic mode upon

the assessee.

6.

The appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

purposes.

Order pronounced on 19.09.2024.

Sd/- Sd/- ( KRINWANT SAHAY) (A.D.JAIN ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT “Poonam” आदेश क� �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/ Copy of the order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ�/ The Appellant 2. ��यथ�/ The Respondent 3. आयकर आयु�/ CIT 4. िवभागीय �ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय आिधकरण, च�डीगढ़/ DR, ITAT, CHANDIGARH 5. गाड� फाईल/ Guard File आदेशानुसार/ By order, सहायक पंजीकार/ Assistant Registrar

GARG FURNACE LIMITED,LUDHIANA vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUDHIANA | BharatTax