NATIONAL POWER TRAINING INSTITUTE,FARIDABAD, HARYANA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH, COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

PDF · subscribers
ITA 117/CHANDI/2024Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 September 2024AY 2023-24Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)3 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal and set aside the matter to the CIT(E). The assessee will be given an opportunity to submit the necessary information and documentation for a fresh decision.

What were the facts?

The assessee's application for registration under section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) was rejected by the CIT(E) for non-submission of information and documentation. The assessee claimed they did not receive the notices from the CIT(E)'s office.

What were the issues?

Whether the rejection of the 12A registration application was justified due to non-receipt of notices by the assessee, and if the assessee should be granted an opportunity to present their case.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Order PER VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M. : This is an appeal filed by the assessee society against the order of the Ld. CIT(E), Chandigarh dt. 21/09/2023 wherein the application filled by the assessee for seeking registration under section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) was rejected by the Ld. CIT(E).

2.

During the course of hearing, the Ld. AR submitted that the assessee society is duly registered under the Haryana Registration and Regulation of Societies Act, 2012 and works under the administrative control of Ministry of Power, Government of India and it had moved an application in Form No. 10AB seeking registration under section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) of the Act on 13/03/2023 which was rejected by the Ld. CIT(E) vide order dated 21/09/2023 stating that the assessee has failed to respond to the notices issued from time to time and due to non-submission of requisite information and documentation, it is difficult to verify the charitable nature and the genuineness of the activities being carried out by the assessee as per its stated objects.

3.

It was submitted that the assessee did not receive any notice from the office of the Ld. CIT(E) either through email or through physical mode hence due to non-receipt of notices, the necessary information/documentation could not be submitted before the Ld. CIT(E). It was submitted that it is only on receipt of demand notice for A.Y 2021- 22 and 2022-23 that the assessee came to know about the ex-parte rejection of its application and immediately, thereafter, it took necessary steps and had filed the appeal before the Tribunal. It was submitted that for reasons beyond the control of the assessee, delay of 80 days has happened in filing the present appeal and an application seeking condonation of delay along with affidavit has been placed on record. It was submitted that in the interest of justice, the delay in filing the present appeal be condoned, the appeal be admitted for adjudication and the assessee be granted an opportunity to provide the necessary information/documentation before the Ld. CIT(E) and the matter may accordingly be set aside to the file of the Ld. CIT(E).

4.

The Ld. CIT DR submitted that the application seeking registration was dismissed by the Ld. CIT(E) on account of lack of requisite documentation to ascertain the objects and activities carried on by the assessee. At the same time it was submitted that Revenue has no objection where the matter is set aside to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) to examine the matter afresh.

5.

We have heard the rival contentions and purused the material available on record. Admittedly, due to non-receipt of the order so passed by the ld CIT(E), the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause in filing the present appeal within the stipulated period. After considering the submissions of the ld AR, the affidavit placed on record and the contents of which have not been disputed by the Revenue, the delay is hereby condoned and the appeal is admitted for adjudication. Similar situation exist in respect of notices issued by the ld CIT(E) which were not received by the assessee and the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause in submitting the necessary information/documentation as so called for by the ld CIT(E) to examine the application seeking the final registration u/s 12AB and the application so filed by the assessee was dismissed by the ld CIT(E). Given that the assessee, through its ld AR, has sought liberty to submit the necessary information/documentation before the ld CIT(E) and which has not been opposed by the ld CIT/DR, we deem it appropriate to remit the matter to the file of the ld CIT(E) to decide the same afresh after providing reasonable opportunity to the assessee. The matter is accordingly set-aside to the file of the ld CIT(E).

More judgments on Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii)

All 679 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →