NATIONAL POWER TRAINING INSTITUTE,FARIDABAD, HARYANA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH, COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

During the course of hearing, the Ld. AR submitted that the assessee society is duly registered under the Haryana Registration and Regulation of Societies Act, 2012 and works under the administrative control of Ministry of Power, Government of India and it had moved an application in Form No. 10AB seeking registration under section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) of the Act on 13/03/2023 which was rejected by the Ld. CIT(E) vide order dated 21/09/2023 stating that the assessee has failed to respond to the notices issued from time to time and due to non-submission of requisite information and documentation, it is difficult to verify the charitable nature and the genuineness of the activities being carried out by the assessee as per its stated objects.

It was submitted that the assessee did not receive any notice from the office of the Ld. CIT(E) either through email or through physical mode hence due to non-receipt of notices, the necessary information/documentation could not be submitted before

The Ld. CIT DR submitted that the application seeking registration was dismissed by the Ld. CIT(E) on account of lack of requisite documentation to ascertain the objects and activities carried on by the assessee. At the same time it was submitted that Revenue has no objection where the matter is set aside to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) to examine the matter afresh.

We have heard the rival contentions and purused the material available on record. Admittedly, due to non-receipt of the order so passed by the ld CIT(E), the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause in filing the present appeal within the stipulated period. After considering the submissions of the ld AR, the affidavit placed on record and the contents of which have not been disputed by the Revenue, the delay is hereby condoned and the appeal is admitted for adjudication. Similar situation exist in respect of notices issued by the ld CIT(E) which were not received by the assessee and the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause in submitting the necessary information/documentation as so called for by the ld CIT(E) to examine the application seeking the final registration u/s 12AB and the application so filed by the assessee was dismissed by the ld CIT(E). Given that the assessee, through its ld AR, has sought liberty to submit the necessary information/documentation before the ld CIT(E) and which has not been opposed by the ld CIT/DR, we deem it appropriate to remit the matter to the file of the ld CIT(E) to decide the same afresh after providing reasonable opportunity to the assessee. The matter is accordingly set-aside to the file of the ld CIT(E).

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court on 27/09/2024 परेश म. जोशी िव"म िसंह यादव (PARESH M. JOSHI) ( VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) "ाियक सद" / JUDICIAL MEMBER लेखा सद"/ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

""यथ"/ The Respondent 3. आयकर आयु"/ CIT 4. आयकर आयु" (अपील)/ The CIT(A) 5. िवभागीय "ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय आिधकरण, च"डीगढ़/ DR, ITAT, CHANDIGARH 6. गाड" फाईल/ Guard File