M/S. SOMANY FINE VITRIFIED PVT. LTD.,MORBI vs. THE PR. CIT-3 , RAJKOT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The Departmental Representative did not object to this request.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2016-17. During the hearing, the assessee's representative sought permission to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's appeal should be permitted to be withdrawn.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “RAJKOT” BENCH, RAJKOT
Before: SMT.ANNAPURNA GUPTA&
O R D E R
PER Ms. MADHUMITA ROY - JM:
The instant appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against the order dated 13.01.2020 passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as to ‘the Act’) by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax- 3, Rajkot (‘the Pr.CIT’) for Assessment Year 2016-17.
(M/s. Somany Fine Vitrified Pvt. Ltd. vs. Pr.CIT) A. Y. 2016-17 - 2- 2. At the time of hearing of appeal of the assessee, the Ld. Authorized Representative sought permission to withdraw the captioned appeal of the assessee referring a written request dated 10.04.2023. Ld. Departmental Representative for the Revenue did not express any objection in this regard. We, therefore, keeping in view of the particular fact, grant the prayers as sought for.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
This Order pronounced on 20/04/2023
Sd/- Sd/- (ANNAPURNA GUPTA) (MADHUMITA ROY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Ahmedabad; Dated 20/04/2023 S. K. SINHA True Copy आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ� / The Appellant 2. ��यथ� / The Respondent. 3. संबं�धत आयकर आयु�त / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु�त(अपील) / The CIT(A)- 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. गाड� फाईल / Guard file. By order/आदेश से,
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026