SUJIT KUMAR BEHERA,BHUBANESWAR vs. ITO, WARD-2(2), BHUBANESWAR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 280/CTK/2016Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack24 January 2017AY 2011-124 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that certain deposits, including opening bank balance, bank interest, surrender value of an insurance policy, and a refund from the father, were explained. However, loans from a sister and a friend were not substantiated.

What were the facts?

The Assessing Officer added the entire cash deposit of Rs. 33,02,620/- to the assessee's income as unexplained. The CIT(A) confirmed the addition of the peak deposit of Rs. 24,06,873/- as undisclosed income.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) erred in calculating the peak credit without considering genuine receipts and opening bank balance, and whether the addition of opening cash in hand was justified.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 68

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK ‘SMC’ BENCH,

Before: SHRI N.S SAINI

For Appellant: Shri C.Parida, AR
For Respondent: Shri D.K.Pradhan, DR
Pronounced: 24/01

This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A)-2,

Bhubaneswar, dated 23.3.2016, for the assessment year 2011-12.

2.

The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:

“”1. That the order passed by the CIT(A) is arbitrary, excessive, contrary to facts and bad in law. 2. That the CIT(A) is erred in calculating the peak credit without considering the genuine receipt and the opening bank balance in the bank account and withdrawn subsequently to redeposit the said in the said bank account.

2 IT A No.2 80 /CT K/20 16 Asse ssme nt Ye ar :2011-12

3.

That the CIT(A) is erred in confirming the addition of opening cash in hand to the tune of Rs.4,20,000/- made by the AO without considering the cash flow statement and other supporting details in respect of the same.”

3.

I have heard the rival submissions and perused the orders of lower

authorities and materials available on record. In the instant case, the

Assessing Officer found that the assessee has made cash deposit in the saving

bank account No.2977000101014291 with Punjab National Bank,

Chandrasekharpur Branch, Bhubaneswar and hence, he treated the same as

unexplained deposit and made an addition of the entire cash deposit of

Rs.33,02,620/- to the income of the assessee.

4.

On appeal, ld CIT(A) held that the peak deposit as on 31.3.2011 of

Rs.24,06,873/- should be treated as undisclosed income of the assessee.

Being aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal.

5.

Ld A.R. of the assessee submitted that from the peak credit, following

amounts should be reduced and the balance amount may be treated as

undisclosed income of the assessee:

Date Amount(Rs.) sources 1.4.2010 5,04,035.18 opening bank balance 28.7.2010 3,30,800 Loan from Sister-Sasmita Behera 5.8.2010 59,272 Loan from friend 5.9.2010 3,003 Bank SB interest 26.10.2010 1,34,494 surrender value of insurance policy 27.1.2011 5,00,000 refund of loan taken by father 2.3.2011 3,519 bank SB interest

3 IT A No.2 80 /CT K/20 16 Asse ssme nt Ye ar :2011-12

6.

On the other hand, ld D.R. supported the orders of lower authorities.

7.

I find that ld A.R. of the assessee has pointed out from annexure-1 of

the paper book which is the copy of bank account of the assessee with Punjab

& National Bank, which shows that there was opening balance of

Rs.5,04,035.18. Further, from annexure-4 of the paper book, which is the

copy of bank statement, it is observed that the assessee has earned interest

from bank of Rs.3,003.00. From annexure-5 of the paper book, which is the

copy of first premium receipt of Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company Limited,

it is observed that the assessee has paid Rs.30,000/- towards premium

amount. In the subsequent page to this annexure is the bank statement which

shows that on 26.10.2010, Rs.1,34,494/- has been paid by the said Bajaj

Allianz Life Insurance Company Limited. Further, annexure-6 of the paper

book is the passbook of Uco Bank, Bhubaneswar, S.B. Account

No.09230102005904, of Shri Sridhar Behera, father of the assessee, wherein,

it is observed that Rs.5,00,000/- was paid on 7.1.2011 to the assessee.

Further, annexure-7 of the paper book is the copy of pass book of the

assessee, which shows that the credit of interest of Rs.3,519.00. Thus, from

the above evidences, it is observed that the source of deposit for

Rs.11,45,051.18 is explained and the source of deposit of Rs.3,30,800/- being

loan from sister –Sasmita Behera and loan of Rs.59,272/- from friend is not

explained by filing any evidence. In my considered view, out of peak deposit

4 IT A No.2 80 /CT K/20 16 Asse ssme nt Ye ar :2011-12

of Rs.15,35,123.18, the assessee should be allowed credit for

Rs.11,45,051.18 and addition for balance amount of Rs.12,61,822/- should

be sustained. I, therefore, modify the order of ld CIT(A) and partly allow the

grounds of appeal of the assessee.

8.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed. Order pronounced in the open court on 24/01/2017 in the presence of parties.

Sd/- (N.S Saini) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Cuttack; Dated 24/01 /2017 B.K.Parida, SPS Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant : Sri Sujit Kumar Behera, Plot No.A-356, Saheed nagar, Bhubaneswar. 2. The respondent: ITO, Ward 2(2), Bhubaneswar. 3. The CIT(A)-2, Bhubaneswar. 4. Pr.CIT, Bhubaneswar. 5. DR, ITAT, Cuttack 6. Guard file. BY ORDER, //True Copy//

ASST.REGISTRAR, ITAT, Cuttack

More judgments on Section 68

All 29,931 judgments and leading authorities on Section 68 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →