GIDC EDUCATION SOCIETY,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-1 (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) dismissed the appeal without considering the details furnished by the assessee. Therefore, the matter was remitted back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was dismissed by the CIT(A) for non-compliance with notices. However, the assessee's AR presented evidence that the required details were furnished.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal without considering the evidence of compliance submitted by the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘’ C’’ BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED
आदेश/O R D E R PER WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the Assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Ahmedabad, arising in the matter of assessment order passed under s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (here-in-after referred to as "the Act") relevant to the Assessment Year 2017-2018.
We have gone through the order of the authorities below and paper book filed by the Ld. AR for the assessee and found that the Ld. CIT(A), has upheld the order of the AO by observing that the assessee was served notices for making necessary compliance but there was no response. Accordingly, the Ld. CIT(A) was of the view that the assessee is not interested in pursuing the appeal filed by it. Thus, the Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assesee vide order dated 28/07/2023.
However, the Ld. AR before us filed the paper book running from pages 1 to 9 and demonstrated the requisite details as desired by the Ld. CIT(A) was furnished which can be verified from page 9 of the paper book.
3.1 The Ld. AR also submitted that the necessary details were furnished vide letter dated 25/06/2023, as evident from the e-proceedings response acknowledgement issued by the income tax department placed on pages 1 and 2 of the paper books. However, the Ld. CIT(A) without considering the same has dismissed the appeal filed by assessee. Accordingly, the ld. AR prayed that the appeal should be set aside to the file of the Ld. CIT(A), for fresh adjudication as per the provision of law.
On the other hand, the Ld. DR did not raise any serious objection if the appeal is set-aside to the file of the Ld. CIT(A), for fresh adjudication as per the provision of law.
In view of the above detailed discussion and in the interest of justice and fair play, we remit the issue to the file of the Ld. CIT(A), for fresh adjudication after taking into necessary details filed by the assessee as per the provisions of law. Hence, the ground of appeal of the assessee is allowed for the statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026