HAJIAMINUDDIN HAJIHISAMUDDIN SHAIKH,VADODARA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1)(1), VADODARA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s ex-parte order and remanded the issue for fresh adjudication. This was done in the interest of justice and fair play, considering the notices were issued during the COVID period.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal against the assessment order was confirmed ex-parte by the CIT(A) due to non-response to notices. The notices were issued during the COVID period.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in passing an ex-parte order without considering the circumstances of the COVID period for issuing notices.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘’ C’’ BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: Ms SUCHITRA KAMBLE & SHRI WASEEM AHMED
आदेश/O R D E R PER WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the Assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Vadodara, arising in the matter of assessment order passed under s. 143 r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (here-in-after referred to as "the Act") relevant to the Assessment Year 2012-13.
In the present case, the Ld. CIT(A), has passed ex-parte order to the assessee after confirming the addition made by the AO. The Ld. CIT(A), has issued two notices dated 22/01/2021 and 06/10/2021 and thereafter a system generated communication dated 07/11/2022, was notified to the assessee, but there was no response. Thus, the Ld. CIT(A), in the absence of any co-operation from the side of the assessee confirmed the order of the AO. The impugned two notices were issued by the Ld. CIT(A) during the covid period and therefore in the interest of justice and fair play we set-aside the issue to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) for fresh adjudication as per the provisions of law. Hence, the ground of appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for the statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for the statistical purposes.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026