INDIRABEN V. PATEL L/H OF LATE VINODBHAI BHIKHUBHAI PATEL,VADODARA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2)(5) NOW WARD 1(2)(1), VADODARA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal found that there was a reasonable cause for the assessee's non-appearance due to their demise. The appeal was restored to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee passed away on July 18, 2020. However, the CIT(A) issued notices after January 8, 2021, and passed an ex-parte order. The assessee's legal heir was not given an opportunity to represent the case.
What were the issues?
Whether an ex-parte order passed by the CIT(A) is valid when the assessee has expired and their legal heir was not properly notified or given an opportunity to be heard.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘’ D’’ BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: Ms SUCHITRA KAMBLE & SHRI WASEEM AHMED
आदेश/O R D E R PER WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the Assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Vadodara, arising in the matter of assessment order passed under s. 143 r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (here-in-after referred to as "the Act") relevant to the Assessment Year 2012-13.
In the present case, the Ld. CIT(A), has passed ex-parte order to the assessee by confirming the order of the AO. However, from the details available to on record, it was noticed that the assessee expired on 18/07/2020, whereas all the notices were issued by the Ld. CIT(A) after 08/01/2021, meaning thereby during the relevant time the assesee was no more in existence. Considering all these facts, it appears to us that there was reasonable cause for non-appearance of the assessee and thus we deem it fit to restore the appeal to the Ld. CIT(A), for fresh adjudication as per the provision of law. The legal heir of the assessee is at the liberty to file the necessary document and raise his contention to set up the case before the Ld. CIT(A). Hence, the ground of appeal of the assessee is allowed for the statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for the statistical purposes.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026