M/S. MUSTUFABHAI ABDULVAHAB PIJWALA,NADIAD vs. THE PR. CIT-2, BARODA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeal filed by the assessee against the 'giving effect order' by the Income Tax Officer is not maintainable before the Tribunal. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the Income Tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi. This order was passed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the maintainability of the assessee's appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal against a 'giving effect order'.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “B” BENCH
Before: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar
Assessment Year 2015-16 M/s. Mustufabhai The Pr. CIT-2, Baroda Abdulvahab Pijwala 57, Sardar Patel Shak Vs Market, NH-8, AT Piplag, Tal Nadiad, Gujarat 387335 PAN: AAVFM4677Q (Respondent) (Appellant) Assessee Represented: Shri Piyush Panchal, A.R. Revenue Represented: Shri Ashok Natha Bhalekar, Sr.D.R. Date of hearing : 06-03-2024 Date of pronouncement : 08-03-2024 आदेश/ORDER PER : T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:-
This appeal is filed by the Assessee as against the Assessment order dated 25.09.2021 passed by the Income Tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi passed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to the Assessment Year 2015-16.
Page No 2 M/s. Mustufabhai Abdulvahab Pilwala vs. PCIT
This appeal filed against the giving effect order by the Income Tax Officer is not maintainable before this Tribunal under section 253 of the Act. Therefore the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby dismissed in limine.
In the result, the appeal is hereby dismissed.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026