P. G. INDIA LOGISTICS PVT. LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE A.O., CPC, BANGALORE PRESENT THE ACIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee sought to withdraw the appeals as the Assessing Officer (AO) had rectified the issue by allowing the claim under Section 154 of the Act. The Tribunal permitted the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed two appeals against orders of the CIT(A) for AY 2017-18 and 2018-19. The grievance was related to the disallowance of PF/ESI contributions.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee can withdraw appeals when the grievance has been resolved by the AO through a rectification order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SMT.ANNAPURNA GUPTA & SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL
PER ANNAPURNA GUPTA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Present two appeals have been filed by the assessee against orders passed by the ld.Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “Ld.CIT(A)”] of even dated i.e. 6.12.2022 passed under section 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as "the Act" for short] for the Asst.Year 2017-18 and 2018-19.
At the outset, the Ld.counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee wants to withdraw its above two appeals, as the grievance of the assessee has been resolved by the AO by passing order section 154 of the Act. The ld.counsel filed identically worded letters dated 12.3.2024 to this effect in both the appeals, which are taken on record. The contents of the letter reads as under: “The hearing of above appeals has been fixed on 14/03/2024 before Hon'ble Bench " B " .In this appeal the ground involved was disallowance of PF/ESI of Rs.11,13,826/- which was not considered by CIT (A) being not part of rectification application Therefore, application U/s 154 for A.Y. 2017-18 was made before the A.O. who by order dated 25/01/2024 passed U/s 154 has allowed the claim of the assessee. & 9 /Ahd/2023 2 Therefore, this appeal is respectfully withdrawn as the issue under appeal has been allowed by the A.O. by passing order U/s 154.”
In view of the submissions of the ld.counsel of the assessee supported by the above letters, we permit the assessee to withdraw the above two appeals.
In the result, both the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the Court on 14th March, 2024 at Ahmedabad.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026