THE ACIT, CIRCLE-4, BARODA vs. M/S. WELSPUN PROJECTS LTD.,(FORMERLY KNOWN AS MSK PROJECTS (INDIA) LTD.,), BARODA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that Section 40(a)(ia) disallowance does not apply to short deduction of TDS if the payee has already been assessed. It also affirmed the deletion of Section 36(1)(iii) interest disallowance and allowed the assessee's claim for Section 80IA deduction on BOT road projects. The Section 14A disallowance was restricted to the exempt income.
What were the facts?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal heard cross-appeals from the Revenue and the assessee concerning assessment year 2010-11. Key issues involved disallowances under Section 40(a)(ia), Section 36(1)(iii), Section 14A, Section 40A(7), and eligibility for Section 80IA deduction.
What were the issues?
The primary issues were the applicability of Section 40(a)(ia) for short TDS deductions, the allowability of interest on advances, the classification of BOT projects for infrastructure development, and the computation of disallowances under Section 14A.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 40(a)(ia),Section 36(1)(iii),Section 14A,Section 40A(7),Section 80IA,Section 201,Section 32
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Joint Investments Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT803 citing372 ITR 694 · 2015 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Ansal Land Mark Township (P) Ltd.369 citing377 ITR 635 · 2015 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. S.K. Tekriwal150 citing361 ITR 432 · 2014 · HC
- Rajeev Kumar Agarwal v. ACIT104 citing149 ITD 363 · 2014 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “A” BENCH AHMEDABAD
PER S. S. GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER
The Revenue and assessee have instituted their instant cross appeals for assessment year 2010-11 against the CIT(A)-III, Baroda’s order dated 04.09.2013 passed in case no. CAB/III-300/12-13, in proceedings u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 254 of t
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 40(a)(ia)
- Rekha Agarwal, Jaipur vs ITO WD 4(1), JaipurITA 844/JPR/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Cdg Petchem Limited, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward - 1(1), HyderabadITA 1900/HYD/2025[2018-2019]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-2019
- M/S. Shree Laminators Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 4(4), KolkataITA 1534/KOL/2026[2011-2012]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2011-2012
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026