HARSH DEVELOPERS,MUMBAI vs. CIT 15, MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's application for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal filed by the assessee was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the CIT under Section 263. The assessee later sought permission to withdraw the appeal as the fresh assessment order did not make significant changes and resulted in a minimal tax demand.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the assessee against the CIT's order under Section 263 should be allowed to be withdrawn.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCHES “H”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI G.S.PANNU (AM) & SHRI RAM LAL NEGI (JM)
The present appeal has been filed by the revenue against order dated 14/03/2014 passed by the Ld. CIT(Appeals)-15, Mumbai pertaining to the assessment year 2009-10.
2. The assesse has challenged the impugned order on the following effective grounds:-
That the Comm. of Income Tax 15, has erred in invoking the provisions of Sec. 263 beyond the time allowed under Sec 263(2). The Order passed under Sec. 263 is barred by limitation.
2. The Comm. of Income Tax 15, has erred in invoking the provisions of Sec. 263 although the Order of ITO 15(2)(3) Mumbai was not erroneous nor was it prejudicial to the Interest of Revenue, considering the facts and circumstances of the Case and Law”
Today, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted an application seeking permission for withdrawal of the present appeal. The relevant portion of which reads as under:-
"We have filled the above appeal against the order u/s 263 dt. 140/03/2004 passed by CIT 15, Mumbai setting aside the original assessment. In the fresh assessment order passed on 26/03/2015, no major changes have been made other than treating the income From Business as Income from other sources resulting in a tax demand on Rs. 3820/- In the circumstances, we seek permission to withdraw the above appeal" 4. The Ld. DR has no objection in allowing the application for withdrawal of the appeal. 5. In view of the written submission made by the appellant, the application is allowed and appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdraw.
Order pronounced in the open court on 23/12/2015
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026