ABODH MEMOERIAL TRUST,BANKURA vs. C.I.T,DURGAPUR, DURGAPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT's order rejecting the Section 12A registration was indeed passed without providing the assessee with proper grounds or an opportunity to be heard. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the CIT's order.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Abodh Memorial Trust, filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) rejecting its application for registration under Section 12A. The assessee contended that the rejection was made without any grounds or opportunity for a hearing.
What were the issues?
Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax can reject an application for registration under Section 12A without providing grounds and an opportunity for a hearing to the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘B’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi
Date of concluding the hearing : December 17, 2015 Date of pronouncing the order : January 06, 2016
O R D E R Per Shri P.M. Jagtap:- This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of Income Tax Officer (Technical), Durgapur dated 22.03.2013 purportedly passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax, Durgapur rejecting the application of the assessee for registration under section 12A of the Act.
At the time of hearing of this appeal before us, none has appeared on behalf of the assessee. In the ground raised in this appeal, the main grievance raised by the assessee is that its application for registration under section 12A of the Act has been rejected by the ld. CIT vide his impugned order without giving any ground or opportunity for hearing and this position, which is clearly evident from the impugned order passed by the ld. CIT, is not disputed even by the ld. D.R. We, therefore, consider it fair and proper and in the interest of justice to set aside the I.T.A. No. 846/KOL./2013 Page 2 of 2 impugned order of the ld. CIT and to remit the matter back to him for disposing of the application of the assessee for registration under section 12A of the Act by passing a well reasoned and well discussed order after giving the assessee proper and sufficient opportunity of being heard.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026