SHRI MILIND PANKAJBHAI SHROFF,JUNAGADH vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1,, RAJKOT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal noted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax under section 263. The assessee's counsel informed the tribunal via email that the assessee wished to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw their appeal against the Pr. CIT's order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT
Before: SMT.ANNAPURNA GUPTA & SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL
PER ANNAPURNA GUPTA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Present appeal has been filed by the assessee against order passed by the ld.Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Rajkot [hereinafter referred to as “ld.Pr.CIT”] dated 16.2.2022 passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as "the Act" for short]for the Asst.Year 2017-18. 2. At the time of hearing, it is noticed that the Registry has received an email dated 7.8.2023 sent by the asseess’s counsel, Shri Samir S. Jani stating that in view of the order passed under section 143(3) read with section 263 dated 22.3.2023, the assessee wants to withdraw his above appeal. Copy of the email is placed on record.
Accordingly, the ld.counsel for the assessee seeks withdrawal of the appeal
In view of the above email and request of the ld.counsel for the assessee at Bar, the appeal of the assessee being stands dismissed as being withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the Court on 7th August, 2023 at Ahmedabad.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026